mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Boosting Deductive Reasoning with Step Signals In RLHF

arXiv 2410.09528 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Logical reasoning is a crucial task for Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling them to tackle complex problems. Among reasoning tasks, multi-step reasoning poses a particular challenge. Grounded in the theory of formal logic, we have developed an automated method, Multi-step Deduction (MuseD), for deductive reasoning data. MuseD has allowed us to create training and testing datasets for multi-step reasoning. Our generation method enables control over the complexity of the generated instructions, facilitating training and evaluation of models across different difficulty levels. Through RLHF training, our training data has demonstrated significant improvements in logical capabilities for both in-domain of out-of-domain reasoning tasks. Additionally, we have conducted tests to assess the multi-step reasoning abilities of various models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2024.

Builds on

11 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models17 Dec
  2. 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning20 May
  3. 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logic2 Sep

Other references · 8

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
  3. 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 426
  4. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 406
  5. 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimizationcited by 246
  6. 2024Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Promptingcited by 210
  7. 2024Faithful Logical Reasoning via Symbolic Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 100
  8. 2021AR-LSAT: Investigating Analytical Reasoning of Textcited by 51

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Learning Deductive Reasoning from Synthetic Corpus based on Formal Logic
  2. 2024Multi-LogiEval: Towards Evaluating Multi-Step Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
  3. 2024Deductive Beam Search: Decoding Deducible Rationale for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  4. 2024Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Principled Synthetic Logic Corpus
  5. 2023Certified Deductive Reasoning with Language Models
  6. 2024ProcBench: Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning and Following Procedure
  7. 2025Evaluating Step-by-step Reasoning Traces: A Survey
  8. 2023Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning