mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FB-Bench: A Fine-Grained Multi-Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs' Responsiveness to Human Feedback

arXiv 2410.09412 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 11

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Human feedback is crucial in the interactions between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing research primarily focuses on benchmarking LLMs in single-turn dialogues. Even in benchmarks designed for multi-turn dialogues, the user inputs are often independent, neglecting the nuanced and complex nature of human feedback within real-world usage scenarios. To fill this research gap, we introduce FB-Bench, a fine-grained, multi-task benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' responsiveness to human feedback under real-world usage scenarios in Chinese. Drawing from the two main interaction scenarios, FB-Bench comprises 591 meticulously curated samples, encompassing eight task types, five deficiency types of response, and nine feedback types. We extensively evaluate a broad array of popular LLMs, revealing significant variations in their performance across different interaction scenarios. Further analysis indicates that task, human feedback, and deficiencies of previous responses can also significantly impact LLMs' responsiveness. Our findings underscore both the strengths and limitations of current models, providing valuable insights and directions for future research. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/PKU-Baichuan-MLSystemLab/FB-Bench.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2024.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Naturally Occurring Feedback is Common, Extractable and Useful15 Jul
  2. 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugs28 Jun
  3. 2023MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedback19 Sep

Other references · 21

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  7. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  8. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
  9. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
  10. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
  11. 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 706
  12. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
9 more
  1. 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 372
  2. 2024MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialoguescited by 247
  3. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
  4. 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 211
  5. 2023The Earth is Flat because...: Investigating LLMs' Belief towards Misinformation via Persuasive Conversationcited by 107
  6. 2024MixEval: Deriving Wisdom of the Crowd from LLM Benchmark Mixturescited by 73
  7. 2023When Large Language Models contradict humans? Large Language Models' Sycophantic Behaviourcited by 61
  8. 2024MathChat: Benchmarking Mathematical Reasoning and Instruction Following in Multi-Turn Interactionscited by 26
  9. 2023Learning to Simulate Natural Language Feedback for Interactive Semantic Parsingcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 2.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023TencentLLMEval: A Hierarchical Evaluation of Real-World Capabilities for Human-Aligned LLMs
  2. 2025MARS-Bench: A Multi-turn Athletic Real-world Scenario Benchmark for Dialogue Evaluation
  3. 2026Beyond Ideal Instruction: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating LLMs in Realistic Interactions
  4. 2025MEDAL: A Framework for Benchmarking LLMs as Multilingual Open-Domain Dialogue Evaluators
  5. 2026Feedback Indices to Evaluate LLM Responses to Rebuttals for Multiple Choice Type Questions
  6. 2025A Survey on Multi-Turn Interaction Capabilities of Large Language Models
  7. 2024On the Benchmarking of LLMs for Open-Domain Dialogue Evaluation
  8. 2024Should We Fine-Tune or RAG? Evaluating Different Techniques to Adapt LLMs for Dialogue