A Target-Aware Analysis of Data Augmentation for Hate Speech Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hate speech is one of the main threats posed by the widespread use of social networks, despite efforts to limit it. Although attention has been devoted to this issue, the lack of datasets and case studies centered around scarcely represented phenomena, such as ableism or ageism, can lead to hate speech detection systems that do not perform well on underrepresented identity groups. Given the unpreceded capabilities of LLMs in producing high-quality data, we investigate the possibility of augmenting existing data with generative language models, reducing target imbalance. We experiment with augmenting 1,000 posts from the Measuring Hate Speech corpus, an English dataset annotated with target identity information, adding around 30,000 synthetic examples using both simple data augmentation methods and different types of generative models, comparing autoregressive and sequence-to-sequence approaches. We find traditional DA methods to often be preferable to generative models, but the combination of the two tends to lead to the best results. Indeed, for some hate categories such as origin, religion, and disability, hate speech classification using augmented data for training improves by more than 10% F1 over the no augmentation baseline. This work contributes to the development of systems for hate speech detection that are not only better performing but also fairer and more inclusive towards targets that have been neglected so far.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.
Builds on
35 of 70 references.
References · 35
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
- 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 368
- 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
- 2022OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalizationcited by 235
- 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
23 more
- 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
- 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 174
- 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 139
- 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
- 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 129
- 2021A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classificationcited by 111
- 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
- 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
- 2021Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speechcited by 81
- 2020Measuring a hate speech spectrum with faceted Rasch item response theory and perspective-aware, explainable-by-design deep learningcited by 67
- 2016Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Mediacited by 48
- 2021Disembodied Machine Learning: On the Illusion of Objectivity in NLPcited by 37
- 2017An optimal transportation approach for assessing almost stochastic ordercited by 33
- 2019Improving short text classification through global augmentation methodscited by 33
- 2020Developing a Multilingual Annotated Corpus of Misogyny and Aggressioncited by 31
- 2024AI for social science and social science of AI: A Surveycited by 29
- 2022deep-significance - Easy and Meaningful Statistical Significance Testing in the Age of Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2021Dataset for Identification of Homophobia and Transophobia in Multilingual YouTube Commentscited by 20
- 2021Fight Fire with Fire: Fine-tuning Hate Detectors using Large Samples of Generated Hate Speechcited by 13
- 2020A little goes a long way: Improving toxic language classification despite data scarcitycited by 12
- 2018Examining a hate speech corpus for hate speech detection and popularity predictioncited by 10
- 2023GDA: Generative Data Augmentation Techniques for Relation Extraction Taskscited by 10
- 2023Vicinal Risk Minimization for Few-Shot Cross-lingual Transfer in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.