Are Minimal Radial Distortion Solvers Necessary for Relative Pose Estimation?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating the relative pose between two cameras is a fundamental step in many applications such as Structure-from-Motion. The common approach to relative pose estimation is to apply a minimal solver inside a RANSAC loop. Highly efficient solvers exist for pinhole cameras. Yet, (nearly) all cameras exhibit radial distortion. Not modeling radial distortion leads to (significantly) worse results. However, minimal radial distortion solvers are significantly more complex than pinhole solvers, both in terms of run-time and implementation efforts. This paper compares radial distortion solvers with a simple-to-implement approach that combines an efficient pinhole solver with sampled radial distortion parameters. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets and RANSAC variants show that this simple approach performs similarly or better than the most accurate minimal distortion solvers at faster run-times while being significantly more accurate than faster non-minimal solvers. We clearly show that complex radial distortion solvers are not necessary in practice. Code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/kocurvik/rd.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.
Builds on
9 of 42 references.
References · 9
- 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 988
- 2016ORB-SLAM2: an Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo and RGB-D Camerascited by 806
- 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 590
- 2018From Coarse to Fine: Robust Hierarchical Localization at Large Scalecited by 559
- 2020Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practicecited by 225
- 2019Understanding the Limitations of CNN-based Absolute Camera Pose Regressioncited by 177
- 2017Graph-Cut RANSACcited by 133
- 2018The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 99
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.