mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Post-hoc Study of Climate Microtargeting on Social Media Ads with LLMs: Thematic Insights and Fairness Evaluation

arXiv 2410.05401 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Climate change communication on social media increasingly employs microtargeting strategies to effectively reach and influence specific demographic groups. This study presents a post-hoc analysis of microtargeting practices within climate campaigns by leveraging large language models (LLMs) to examine Meta (previously known as Facebook) advertisements. Our analysis focuses on two key aspects: demographic targeting and fairness. We evaluate the ability of LLMs to accurately predict the intended demographic targets, such as gender and age group. Furthermore, we instruct the LLMs to generate explanations for their classifications, providing transparent reasoning behind each decision. These explanations reveal the specific thematic elements used to engage different demographic segments, highlighting distinct strategies tailored to various audiences. Our findings show that young adults are primarily targeted through messages emphasizing activism and environmental consciousness, while women are engaged through themes related to caregiving roles and social advocacy. Additionally, we conduct a comprehensive fairness analysis to uncover biases in model predictions. We assess disparities in accuracy and error rates across demographic groups using established fairness metrics such as Demographic Parity, Equal Opportunity, and Predictive Equality. Our findings indicate that while LLMs perform well overall, certain biases exist, particularly in the classification of male audiences. The analysis of thematic explanations uncovers recurring patterns in messaging strategies tailored to various demographic groups, while the fairness analysis underscores the need for more inclusive targeting methods. This study provides a valuable framework for future research aimed at enhancing transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in social media-driven climate campaigns.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

34 of 106 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  7. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  8. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  9. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  10. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  11. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
  12. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
22 more
  1. 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
  2. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 210
  3. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
  4. 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 97
  5. 2023Supporting Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Combining Codebook with GPT-3 for Deductive Codingcited by 82
  6. 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
  7. 2023LLM-in-the-loop: Leveraging Large Language Model for Thematic Analysiscited by 70
  8. 2024Investigating Bias in LLM-Based Bias Detection: Disparities between LLMs and Human Perceptioncited by 55
  9. 2023ROBBIE: Robust Bias Evaluation of Large Generative Language Modelscited by 53
  10. 2013Challenges of Big Data Analysiscited by 47
  11. 2024The Impossibility of Fair LLMscited by 22
  12. 2023Can Large Language Models emulate an inductive Thematic Analysis of semi-structured interviews? An exploration and provocation on the limits of the approach and the modelcited by 15
  13. 2020Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on Facebookcited by 9
  14. 2022Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Campaign on Facebook using Minimal Supervisioncited by 9
  15. 2024Uncovering Latent Arguments in Social Media Messaging by Employing LLMs-in-the-Loop Strategycited by 9
  16. 2021Clandestino or Rifugiato? Anti-immigration Facebook Ad Targeting in Italycited by 8
  17. 2022Weakly Supervised Learning for Analyzing Political Campaigns on Facebookcited by 8
  18. 2024Discovering Latent Themes in Social Media Messaging: A Machine-in-the-Loop Approach Integrating LLMscited by 8
  19. 2020Facebook Ads: Politics of Migration in Italycited by 5
  20. 2022Gender and Racial Stereotype Detection in Legal Opinion Word Embeddingscited by 4
  21. 2022A methodology to characterize bias and harmful stereotypes in natural language processing in Latin Americacited by 2
  22. 2017Targeted Advertising Based on Browsing Historycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.