mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LRHP: Learning Representations for Human Preferences via Preference Pairs

arXiv 2410.04503 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

To improve human-preference alignment training, current research has developed numerous preference datasets consisting of preference pairs labeled as "preferred" or "dispreferred". These preference pairs are typically used to encode human preferences into a single numerical value through reward modeling, which acts as a reward signal during reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, representing these human preferences as a numerical value complicates the analysis of these preferences and restricts their broader applications other than RLHF. In contrast, in this work, we introduce a preference representation learning task that aims to construct a richer and more structured representation of human preferences. We further develop a more generalizable framework, Learning Representations for Human Preferences via preference pairs (namely LRHP), which extends beyond traditional reward modeling to tackle this task. We verify the utility of preference representations in two downstream tasks: preference data selection and preference margin prediction. Building upon the human preferences in representations, we achieve strong performance in both tasks, significantly outperforming baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2024.

Builds on

31 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Inverse-RLignment: Large Language Model Alignment from Demonstrations through Inverse Reinforcement Learning24 May
  2. 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimization4 Oct
  3. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training2 Jun
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  5. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  7. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback17 Dec

Other references · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  10. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  11. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  12. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
12 more
  1. 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 294
  2. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  3. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMscited by 265
  4. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
  5. 2019Do NLP Models Know Numbers? Probing Numeracy in Embeddingscited by 157
  6. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
  7. 2024Efficient Prompting Methods for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 46
  8. 2024Get more for less: Principled Data Selection for Warming Up Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 32
  9. 2023ESRL: Efficient Sampling-based Reinforcement Learning for Sequence Generationcited by 15
  10. 2024RoVRM: A Robust Visual Reward Model Optimized via Auxiliary Textual Preference Datacited by 15
  11. 2023Improved Knowledge Distillation for Pre-trained Language Models via Knowledge Selectioncited by 12
  12. 2021Efficient pre-training objectives for Transformerscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Influencing Humans to Conform to Preference Models for RLHF
  2. 2025Learning a Canonical Basis of Human Preferences from Binary Ratings
  3. 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment
  4. 2024Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparison
  5. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy
  6. 2025PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling
  7. 2026Beyond Binary Preferences: A Principled Framework for Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback
  8. 2024Beyond Bradley-Terry Models: A General Preference Model for Language Model Alignment