Probability-Consistent Preference Optimization for Enhanced LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in preference optimization have demonstrated significant potential for improving mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs). While current approaches leverage high-quality pairwise preference data through outcome-based criteria like answer correctness or consistency, they fundamentally neglect the internal logical coherence of responses. To overcome this, we propose Probability-Consistent Preference Optimization (PCPO), a novel framework that establishes dual quantitative metrics for preference selection: (1) surface-level answer correctness and (2) intrinsic token-level probability consistency across responses. Extensive experiments show that our PCPO consistently outperforms existing outcome-only criterion approaches across a diverse range of LLMs and benchmarks. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/YunqiaoYang/PCPO.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.
Builds on
32 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Self-Consistency Preference Optimization6 Nov
- 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization30 Apr
- 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges31 Jan
Other references · 29
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
17 more
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
- 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 205
- 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 135
- 2024Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Needcited by 132
- 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Losscited by 108
- 2024Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capabilitycited by 80
- 2020Consistency of a Recurrent Language Model With Respect to Incomplete Decodingcited by 54
- 2023RLCD: Reinforcement Learning from Contrastive Distillation for Language Model Alignmentcited by 42
- 2024Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspectivecited by 15
- 2024SparsePO: Controlling Preference Alignment of LLMs via Sparse Token Maskscited by 9
- 2024LRHP: Learning Representations for Human Preferences via Preference Pairscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs
- 2024Preference Optimization for Reasoning with Pseudo Feedback
- 2024Plug-and-Play Training Framework for Preference Optimization
- 2024Aligning with Logic: Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Logical Preference Consistency in Large Language Models
- 2026HiPO: Hierarchical Preference Optimization for Adaptive Reasoning in LLMs
- 2025MDPO: Multi-Granularity Direct Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2024Step-level Value Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2024PORT: Preference Optimization on Reasoning Traces