ASCIIEval: Benchmarking Models' Visual Perception in Text Strings via ASCII Art
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Perceiving visual semantics embedded within consecutive characters is a crucial yet under-explored capability for both Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). In this work, we select ASCII art as a representative artifact. It depicts concepts through careful arrangement of characters, which can be formulated in both text and image modalities. We frame the problem as a recognition task, and construct a novel benchmark, ASCIIEval. It covers over 3K samples with an elaborate categorization tree, along with a training set for further enhancement. Encompassing a comprehensive analysis of tens of models through different input modalities, our benchmark demonstrate its multi-faceted diagnostic power. Given textual input, language models shows their visual perception ability on ASCII art concepts. Proprietary models achieve over 70% accuracy on certain categories, with GPT-5 topping the rank. For image inputs, we reveal that open-source MLLMs suffer from a trade-off between fine-grained text recognition and collective visual perception. They exhibit limited generalization ability to this special kind of arts, leading to the dramatic gap of over 20.01% accuracy compared with their proprietary counterparts. Another critical finding is that model performance is sensitive to the length of the ASCII art, with this sensitivity varying across input modalities. Unfortunately, none of the models could successfully benefit from the simultaneous provision of both modalities, highlighting the need for more flexible modality-fusion approaches. Besides, we also introduce approaches for further enhancement and discuss future directions. Resources are available at https://github.com/JiaQiSJTU/VisionInText.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.
Builds on
21 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?29 Mar
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond24 Aug
Other references · 19
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2023CogVLM: Visual Expert for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 704
- 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 466
- 2024MA-LMM: Memory-Augmented Large Multimodal Model for Long-Term Video Understandingcited by 223
7 more
- 2024ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMscited by 197
- 2024Mind's Eye of LLMs: Visualization-of-Thought Elicits Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 65
- 2024Tables as Texts or Images: Evaluating the Table Reasoning Ability of LLMs and MLLMscited by 40
- 2024Can Large Language Models Understand Symbolic Graphics Programs?cited by 32
- 2023Bot or Human? Detecting ChatGPT Imposters with A Single Questioncited by 25
- 2023Testing the Depth of ChatGPT's Comprehension via Cross-Modal Tasks Based on ASCII-Art: GPT3.5's Abilities in Regard to Recognizing and Generating ASCII-Art Are Not Totally Lackingcited by 7
- 2024Diverse and Fine-Grained Instruction-Following Ability Exploration with Synthetic Datacited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoningcited by 165
- 2025Text Speaks Louder than Vision: ASCII Art Reveals Textual Biases in Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026ASCII Art Turns LLMs into VLA Controllerscited by 1
- 2026Resolution Thresholds in VLM Detection of Harmful ASCII Art Across Construction Modes and Languagescited by 0
- 2026Resolution Thresholds in VLM Detection of Harmful ASCII Art Across Construction Modes and Languages28 Jun 2026
- 2026ASCII Art Turns LLMs into VLA Controllers19 Jun 2026
- 2025Text Speaks Louder than Vision: ASCII Art Reveals Textual Biases in Vision-Language Models2 Apr 2025
- 2024OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning31 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026VISTA-Bench: Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visualized Text as Well as Pure Text?
- 2026Reading neq Seeing: Diagnosing and Closing the Typography Gap in Vision-Language Models
- 2025See the Text: From Tokenization to Visual Reading
- 2023Visual Data-Type Understanding does not emerge from Scaling Vision-Language Models
- 2023Learning the Visualness of Text Using Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025ReadBench: Measuring the Dense Text Visual Reading Ability of Vision-Language Models
- 2024Unveiling Visual Perception in Language Models: An Attention Head Analysis Approach
- 2025Visual Text Processing: A Comprehensive Review and Unified Evaluation