mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visual Data-Type Understanding does not emerge from Scaling Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2310.08577 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in the development of vision-language models (VLMs) are yielding remarkable success in recognizing visual semantic content, including impressive instances of compositional image understanding. Here, we introduce the novel task of Visual Data-Type Identification, a basic perceptual skill with implications for data curation (e.g., noisy data-removal from large datasets, domain-specific retrieval) and autonomous vision (e.g., distinguishing changing weather conditions from camera lens staining). We develop two datasets consisting of animal images altered across a diverse set of 27 visual data-types, spanning four broad categories. An extensive zero-shot evaluation of 39 VLMs, ranging from 100M to 80B parameters, shows a nuanced performance landscape. While VLMs are reasonably good at identifying certain stylistic textitdata-types, such as cartoons and sketches, they struggle with simpler data-types arising from basic manipulations like image rotations or additive noise. Our findings reveal that (i) model scaling alone yields marginal gains for contrastively-trained models like CLIP, and (ii) there is a pronounced drop in performance for the largest auto-regressively trained VLMs like OpenFlamingo. This finding points to a blind spot in current frontier VLMs: they excel in recognizing semantic content but fail to acquire an understanding of visual data-types through scaling. By analyzing the pre-training distributions of these models and incorporating data-type information into the captions during fine-tuning, we achieve a significant enhancement in performance. By exploring this previously uncharted task, we aim to set the stage for further advancing VLMs to equip them with visual data-type understanding. Code and datasets are released at https://github.com/bethgelab/DataTypeIdentification.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 90 of its 131 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2023.

Builds on

90 of 131 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023OpenFlamingo: An Open-Source Framework for Training Large Autoregressive Vision-Language Models2 Aug
  2. 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Ten23 Feb
  3. 2022VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relations1 Jul

Other references · 87

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  6. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  7. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  8. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  9. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  10. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  11. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  12. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
38 more
  1. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  6. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  7. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  8. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  9. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  10. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  11. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  12. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  13. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  14. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  15. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  16. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  17. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
  18. 2023mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodalitycited by 1,038
  19. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  20. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  21. 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 929
  22. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  23. 2023GLIGEN: Open-Set Grounded Text-to-Image Generationcited by 774
  24. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 772
  25. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
  26. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  27. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  28. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  29. 2023Otter: A Multi-Modal Model with In-Context Instruction Tuningcited by 548
  30. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
  31. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  32. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  33. 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modelingcited by 429
  34. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  35. 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 372
  36. 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 368
  37. 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 331
  38. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 287

50 most cited of 87 All 87 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 2.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Building and better understanding vision-language models: insights and future directions
  2. 202620/20 Vision Language Models: A Prescription for Better VLMs through Data Curation Alone
  3. 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
  4. 2023Probing Conceptual Understanding of Large Visual-Language Models
  5. 2024What's in the Image? A Deep-Dive into the Vision of Vision Language Models
  6. 2026DataComp-VLM: Improved Open Datasets for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024Revisiting MLLMs: An In-Depth Analysis of Image Classification Abilities
  8. 2025Same or Not? Enhancing Visual Perception in Vision-Language Models