Unleashing the Unseen: Harnessing Benign Datasets for Jailbreaking Large Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite significant ongoing efforts in safety alignment, large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 and LLaMA 3 remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that can induce harmful behaviors, including through the use of adversarial suffixes. Building on prior research, we hypothesize that these adversarial suffixes are not mere bugs but may represent features that can dominate the LLM's behavior. To evaluate this hypothesis, we conduct several experiments. First, we demonstrate that benign features can be effectively made to function as adversarial suffixes, i.e., we develop a feature extraction method to extract sample-agnostic features from benign dataset in the form of suffixes and show that these suffixes may effectively compromise safety alignment. Second, we show that adversarial suffixes generated from jailbreak attacks may contain meaningful features, i.e., appending the same suffix to different prompts results in responses exhibiting specific characteristics. Third, we show that such benign-yet-safety-compromising features can be easily introduced through fine-tuning using only benign datasets. As a result, we are able to completely eliminate GPT's safety alignment in a blackbox setting through finetuning with only benign data. Our code and data is available at urlhttps://github.com/suffix-maybe-feature/adver-suffix-maybe-features.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2024.
Builds on
20 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations10 Oct
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
Other references · 17
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 533
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generationcited by 439
- 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreakercited by 337
5 more
- 2024AmpleGCG: Learning a Universal and Transferable Generative Model of Adversarial Suffixes for Jailbreaking Both Open and Closed LLMscited by 160
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 116
- 2024ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddingscited by 31
- 2024Talking Nonsense: Probing Large Language Models' Understanding of Adversarial Gibberish Inputscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Cats Confuse Reasoning LLM: Query Agnostic Adversarial Triggers for Reasoning Modelscited by 23
- 2025Using Mechanistic Interpretability to Craft Adversarial Attacks against Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2026Antibody: Strengthening Defense Against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Gradient Influencecited by 6
- 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sinkcited by 3
- 2026Antibody: Strengthening Defense Against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Gradient Influence28 Feb 2026
- 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sink5 Feb 2026
- 2025Using Mechanistic Interpretability to Craft Adversarial Attacks against Large Language Models8 Mar 2025
- 2025Cats Confuse Reasoning LLM: Query Agnostic Adversarial Triggers for Reasoning Models3 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
- 2025SafeLLM: Unlearning Harmful Outputs from Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks
- 2025Jailbreaking Attacks vs. Content Safety Filters: How Far Are We in the LLM Safety Arms Race?
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep
- 2025Paper Summary Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs through LLM Safety Papers
- 2026Target-free Latent Safety Alignment
- 2024Defending against Jailbreak through Early Exit Generation of Large Language Models