mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddings

arXiv 2402.16006 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 31

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

The safety defense methods of Large language models(LLMs) stays limited because the dangerous prompts are manually curated to just few known attack types, which fails to keep pace with emerging varieties. Recent studies found that attaching suffixes to harmful instructions can hack the defense of LLMs and lead to dangerous outputs. However, similar to traditional text adversarial attacks, this approach, while effective, is limited by the challenge of the discrete tokens. This gradient based discrete optimization attack requires over 100,000 LLM calls, and due to the unreadable of adversarial suffixes, it can be relatively easily penetrated by common defense methods such as perplexity filters. To cope with this challenge, in this paper, we proposes an Adversarial Suffix Embedding Translation Framework (ASETF), aimed at transforming continuous adversarial suffix embeddings into coherent and understandable text. This method greatly reduces the computational overhead during the attack process and helps to automatically generate multiple adversarial samples, which can be used as data to strengthen LLMs security defense. Experimental evaluations were conducted on Llama2, Vicuna, and other prominent LLMs, employing harmful directives sourced from the Advbench dataset. The results indicate that our method significantly reduces the computation time of adversarial suffixes and achieves a much better attack success rate to existing techniques, while significantly enhancing the textual fluency of the prompts. In addition, our approach can be generalized into a broader method for generating transferable adversarial suffixes that can successfully attack multiple LLMs, even black-box LLMs, such as ChatGPT and Gemini.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2024.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts19 Sep
  2. 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Prompting6 Sep
  3. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 15

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  4. 2022Diffusion-LM Improves Controllable Text Generationcited by 1,006
  5. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  6. 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 608
  7. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
  8. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
  9. 2023LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Trickedcited by 226
  10. 2023The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensivenesscited by 63
  11. 2023LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?cited by 47
  12. 2024Gradient-Based Language Model Red Teamingcited by 33
3 more
  1. 2021Controlling Text Edition by Changing Answers of Specific Questionscited by 6
  2. 2024Harnessing the Plug-and-Play Controller by Promptingcited by 4
  3. 2023Text Attribute Control via Closed-Loop Disentanglementcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 20; 2026: 5.

31 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024LLMs know their vulnerabilities: Uncover Safety Gaps through Natural Distribution Shiftscited by 80
  2. 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attackscited by 32
  3. 2025PR-Attack: Coordinated Prompt-RAG Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Large Language Models via Bilevel Optimizationcited by 29
  4. 2025Layer-Aware Representation Filtering: Purifying Finetuning Data to Preserve LLM Safety Alignmentcited by 24
  5. 2025Adversarial Tokenizationcited by 11
  6. 2025Response Attack: Exploiting Contextual Priming to Jailbreak Large Language Modelscited by 10
  7. 2025Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs via Persona Promptscited by 10
  8. 2025GuidedBench: Measuring and Mitigating the Evaluation Discrepancies of In-the-wild LLM Jailbreak Methodscited by 9
  9. 2025SECA: Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks for Eliciting LLM Hallucinationscited by 9
  10. 2024Recent advancements in LLM Red-Teaming: Techniques, Defenses, and Ethical Considerationscited by 8
  11. 2024DiffusionAttacker: Diffusion-Driven Prompt Manipulation for LLM Jailbreakcited by 8
  12. 2025Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLMcited by 8
19 more
  1. 2024Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Contextcited by 6
  2. 2026Be Your Own Red Teamer: Safety Alignment via Self-Play and Reflective Experience Replaycited by 6
  3. 2025Dagger Behind Smile: Fool LLMs with a Happy Ending Storycited by 5
  4. 2025Sugar-Coated Poison: Benign Generation Unlocks LLM Jailbreakingcited by 5
  5. 2024Unleashing the Unseen: Harnessing Benign Datasets for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 4
  6. 2025KDA: A Knowledge-Distilled Attacker for Generating Diverse Prompts to Jailbreak LLMscited by 4
  7. 2024Human-Readable Adversarial Prompts: An Investigation into LLM Vulnerabilities Using Situational Contextcited by 3
  8. 2026Safety Recovery in Reasoning Models Is Only a Few Early Steering Steps Awaycited by 3
  9. 2026Jailbreaking Leaves a Trace: Understanding and Detecting Jailbreak Attacks from Internal Representations of Large Language Modelscited by 3
  10. 2025BitBypass: A New Direction in Jailbreaking Aligned Large Language Models with Bitstream Camouflagecited by 2
  11. 2025Attention-Aware GNN-based Input Defense against Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreakcited by 2
  12. 2025CoCoTen: Detecting Adversarial Inputs to Large Language Models through Latent Space Features of Contextual Co-occurrence Tensorscited by 2
  13. 2025Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generationcited by 1
  14. 2026Exposing Long-Tail Safety Failures in Large Language Models through Efficient Diverse Response Samplingcited by 1
  15. 2026EvoJail: Evolutionary Diverse Jailbreak Prompt Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 1
  16. 2025Embedding Poisoning: Bypassing Safety Alignment via Embedding Semantic Shiftcited by 0
  17. 2025SafeBehavior: Simulating Human-Like Multistage Reasoning to Mitigate Jailbreak Attacks in Large Language Modelscited by 0
  18. 2025RAID: Refusal-Aware and Integrated Decoding for Jailbreaking LLMscited by 0
  19. 2025REMIND: Input Loss Landscapes Reveal Residual Memorization in Post-Unlearning LLMscited by 0