mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scheherazade: Evaluating Chain-of-Thought Math Reasoning in LLMs with Chain-of-Problems

arXiv 2410.00151 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Benchmarks are critical for measuring Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning capabilities. Some benchmarks have even become the de facto indicator of such capabilities. However, as LLM reasoning capabilities improve, existing widely-used benchmarks such as GSM8K marginally encapsulate model reasoning differentials - most state-of-the-art models for example achieve over 94% accuracy on the GSM8K dataset (paperwithcode, 2024). While constructing harder benchmarks is possible, their creation is often manual, expensive, and unscalable. As such, we present Scheherazade, an automated approach to produce large quantities of challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks by logically chaining a small starting set of problems. We propose two different chaining methods, forward chaining and backward chaining, which include randomized branching techniques to generate complex reasoning problems. We apply Scheherazade on GSM8K to create GSM8K-Scheherazade and evaluate 3 frontier LLMs and OpenAI's o1-preview on it. We show that while other frontier models' performance declines precipitously at only a few questions chained, our evaluation suggests o1-preview's performance persists, with the flagship OpenAI model the only one to perform better at backward reasoning. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/YoshikiTakashima/scheherazade-code-data.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

9 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 2.1, Grade-School Math and the Hidden Reasoning Process29 Jul
  2. 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic1 May
  3. 2024Premise Order Matters in Reasoning with Large Language Models14 Feb

Other references · 6

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
  5. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
  6. 2024On Leakage of Code Generation Evaluation Datasetscited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models
  2. 2026Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
  3. 2025Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models
  4. 2026Unmasking Reasoning Processes: A Process-aware Benchmark for Evaluating Structural Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs
  5. 2025UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models
  6. 2025Premise-Augmented Reasoning Chains Improve Error Identification in Math reasoning with LLMs
  7. 2025Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges
  8. 2025Putnam-AXIOM: A Functional and Static Benchmark for Measuring Higher Level Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs