mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Putnam-AXIOM: A Functional and Static Benchmark for Measuring Higher Level Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs

arXiv 2508.08292 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 11

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Current mathematical reasoning benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) are approaching saturation, with some achieving > 90% accuracy, and are increasingly compromised by training-set contamination. We introduce Putnam-AXIOM, a benchmark of 522 university-level competition problems drawn from the prestigious William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition, and Putnam-AXIOM Variation, an unseen companion set of 100 functional variants generated by programmatically perturbing variables and constants. The variation protocol produces an unlimited stream of equally difficult, unseen instances -- yielding a contamination-resilient test bed. On the Original set, OpenAI's o1-preview -- the strongest evaluated model -- scores 41.9%, but its accuracy drops by 19.6% (46.8% relative decrease) on the paired Variations. The remaining eighteen models show the same downward trend, ten of them with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals. These gaps suggest memorization and highlight the necessity of dynamic benchmarks. We complement "boxed" accuracy with Teacher-Forced Accuracy (TFA), a lightweight metric that directly scores reasoning traces and automates natural language proof evaluations. Putnam-AXIOM therefore provides a rigorous, contamination-resilient evaluation framework for assessing advanced mathematical reasoning of LLMs. Data and evaluation code are publicly available at https://github.com/brando90/putnam-axiom.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 30 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.

Builds on

30 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Achieving >97% on GSM8K: Deeply Understanding the Problems Makes LLMs Better Solvers for Math Word Problems23 Apr
  2. 2024MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problems6 Apr
  3. 2024Functional Benchmarks for Robust Evaluation of Reasoning Performance, and the Reasoning Gap29 Feb
  4. 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models3 Aug
  5. 2023ARB: Advanced Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models25 Jul
  6. 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models20 Jul

Other references · 24

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  6. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
  7. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
  8. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  9. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
  10. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
  11. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  12. 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 631
12 more
  1. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
  2. 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
  3. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  4. 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 236
  5. 2022ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answeringcited by 196
  6. 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 165
  7. 2024LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 99
  8. 2024Compression Represents Intelligence Linearlycited by 56
  9. 2024Why Has Predicting Downstream Capabilities of Frontier AI Models with Scale Remained Elusive?cited by 40
  10. 2023Multilingual Mathematical Autoformalizationcited by 39
  11. 2023Pretraining on the Test Set Is All You Needcited by 33
  12. 2022Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Natural Language Generationcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 8.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RealMath: A Continuous Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Research-Level Mathematics
  2. 2025ReliableMath: Benchmark of Reliable Mathematical Reasoning on Large Language Models
  3. 2025UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models
  4. 2026More Accurate or More Efficient? Evaluating Locally Deployed Compact Open-Weight Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
  5. 2025Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models
  6. 2026General365: Benchmarking General Reasoning in Large Language Models Across Diverse and Challenging Tasks
  7. 2026Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
  8. 2026Unmasking Reasoning Processes: A Process-aware Benchmark for Evaluating Structural Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs