mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

StepMathAgent: A Step-Wise Agent for Evaluating Mathematical Processes through Tree-of-Error

arXiv 2503.10105 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2025cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating mathematical capabilities is critical for assessing the overall performance of large language models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation methods often focus solely on final answers, resulting in highly inaccurate and uninterpretable evaluation outcomes, as well as their failure to assess proof or open-ended problems. To address these issues, we propose a novel mathematical process evaluation agent based on Tree-of-Error, called StepMathAgent. This agent incorporates four internal core operations: logical step segmentation, step scoring, score aggregation and error tree generation, along with four external extension modules: difficulty calibration, simplicity evaluation, completeness validation and format assessment. Furthermore, we introduce StepMathBench, a benchmark comprising 1,000 step-divided process evaluation instances, derived from 200 high-quality math problems grouped by problem type, subject category and difficulty level. Experiments on StepMathBench show that our proposed StepMathAgent outperforms all state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating human-aligned evaluation preferences and broad applicability to various scenarios. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/SHU-XUN/StepMathAgent.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2025.

Builds on

21 of 25 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  5. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  6. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
  7. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  8. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
  9. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 350
  10. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 284
  11. 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 177
  12. 2023How well do Large Language Models perform in Arithmetic tasks?cited by 130
9 more
  1. 2025PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Modelscited by 99
  2. 2024Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Beyond Accuracycited by 69
  3. 2024Is Your Model Really A Good Math Reasoner? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning with Checklistcited by 48
  4. 2025ReARTeR: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with Trustworthy Process Rewardingcited by 32
  5. 2024U-MATH: A University-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Skills in LLMscited by 24
  6. 2024CMMaTH: A Chinese Multi-modal Math Skill Evaluation Benchmark for Foundation Modelscited by 15
  7. 2024Evaluating GPT-4 at Grading Handwritten Solutions in Math Examscited by 10
  8. 2024UTMath: Math Evaluation with Unit Test via Reasoning-to-Coding Thoughtscited by 8
  9. 2024Scheherazade: Evaluating Chain-of-Thought Math Reasoning in LLMs with Chain-of-Problemscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning
  2. 2025Step-KTO: Optimizing Mathematical Reasoning through Stepwise Binary Feedback
  3. 2025Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving
  4. 2024Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correction
  5. 2025Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models
  6. 2026Unmasking Reasoning Processes: A Process-aware Benchmark for Evaluating Structural Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs
  7. 2025Evaluating Step-by-step Reasoning Traces: A Survey
  8. 2026Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs