mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adverse Weather Optical Flow: Cumulative Homogeneous-Heterogeneous Adaptation

arXiv 2409.17001 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2024cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optical flow has made great progress in clean scenes, while suffers degradation under adverse weather due to the violation of the brightness constancy and gradient continuity assumptions of optical flow. Typically, existing methods mainly adopt domain adaptation to transfer motion knowledge from clean to degraded domain through one-stage adaptation. However, this direct adaptation is ineffective, since there exists a large gap due to adverse weather and scene style between clean and real degraded domains. Moreover, even within the degraded domain itself, static weather (e.g., fog) and dynamic weather (e.g., rain) have different impacts on optical flow. To address above issues, we explore synthetic degraded domain as an intermediate bridge between clean and real degraded domains, and propose a cumulative homogeneous-heterogeneous adaptation framework for real adverse weather optical flow. Specifically, for clean-degraded transfer, our key insight is that static weather possesses the depth-association homogeneous feature which does not change the intrinsic motion of the scene, while dynamic weather additionally introduces the heterogeneous feature which results in a significant boundary discrepancy in warp errors between clean and degraded domains. For synthetic-real transfer, we figure out that cost volume correlation shares a similar statistical histogram between synthetic and real degraded domains, benefiting to holistically aligning the homogeneous correlation distribution for synthetic-real knowledge distillation. Under this unified framework, the proposed method can progressively and explicitly transfer knowledge from clean scenes to real adverse weather. In addition, we further collect a real adverse weather dataset with manually annotated optical flow labels and perform extensive experiments to verify the superiority of the proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 74 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.

Builds on

74 of 104 references.

References · 74

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  4. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
  5. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
  6. 2024Depth Anything: Unleashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Datacited by 1,360
  7. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,311
  8. 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,059
  9. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 968
  10. 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 784
  11. 2017Unsupervised Learning of Depth and Ego-Motion from Videocited by 782
  12. 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 683
38 more
  1. 2020Contrastive Learning for Unpaired Image-to-Image Translationcited by 639
  2. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
  3. 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 429
  4. 2016Optical Flow Estimation using a Spatial Pyramid Networkcited by 424
  5. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 403
  6. 2016Deep Joint Rain Detection and Removal from a Single Imagecited by 352
  7. 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 351
  8. 2023Repurposing Diffusion-Based Image Generators for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 327
  9. 2019FFA-Net: Feature Fusion Attention Network for Single Image Dehazingcited by 307
  10. 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 275
  11. 2018Density-aware Single Image De-raining using a Multi-stream Dense Networkcited by 248
  12. 2019Sliced Wasserstein Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 235
  13. 2019GridDehazeNet: Attention-Based Multi-Scale Network for Image Dehazingcited by 227
  14. 2021Learning to Estimate Hidden Motions with Global Motion Aggregationcited by 224
  15. 2018Competitive Collaboration: Joint Unsupervised Learning of Depth, Camera Motion, Optical Flow and Motion Segmentationcited by 222
  16. 2021Contrastive Learning for Compact Single Image Dehazingcited by 219
  17. 2017UnFlow: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow with a Bidirectional Census Losscited by 202
  18. 2020AANet: Adaptive Aggregation Network for Efficient Stereo Matchingcited by 202
  19. 2019Heavy Rain Image Restoration: Integrating Physics Model and Conditional Adversarial Learningcited by 157
  20. 2018DF-Net: Unsupervised Joint Learning of Depth and Flow using Cross-Task Consistencycited by 148
  21. 2018Gated Fusion Network for Single Image Dehazingcited by 133
  22. 2019Iterative Residual Refinement for Joint Optical Flow and Occlusion Estimationcited by 131
  23. 2019SelFlow: Self-Supervised Learning of Optical Flowcited by 128
  24. 2020What Matters in Unsupervised Optical Flowcited by 124
  25. 2020Learning by Analogy: Reliable Supervision from Transformations for Unsupervised Optical Flow Estimationcited by 120
  26. 2020MaskFlownet: Asymmetric Feature Matching with Learnable Occlusion Maskcited by 117
  27. 2023FlowFormer++: Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Pretraining Optical Flow Estimationcited by 114
  28. 2020Cross-domain Detection via Graph-induced Prototype Alignmentcited by 109
  29. 2020Domain Adaptation for Image Dehazingcited by 108
  30. 2021AutoFlow: Learning a Better Training Set for Optical Flowcited by 102
  31. 2016Back to Basics: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow via Brightness Constancy and Motion Smoothnesscited by 101
  32. 2017Occlusion Aware Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flowcited by 101
  33. 2018Model Adaptation with Synthetic and Real Data for Semantic Dense Foggy Scene Understandingcited by 98
  34. 2015EpicFlow: Edge-Preserving Interpolation of Correspondences for Optical Flowcited by 80
  35. 2021SMURF: Self-Teaching Multi-Frame Unsupervised RAFT with Full-Image Warpingcited by 74
  36. 2016Fast Optical Flow using Dense Inverse Searchcited by 71
  37. 2019DDFlow: Learning Optical Flow with Unlabeled Data Distillationcited by 63
  38. 2023Robust Monocular Depth Estimation under Challenging Conditionscited by 58

50 most cited of 74 All 74 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025WeatherEdit: Controllable Weather Editing with 4D Gaussian Field
  2. 2025Real-World Adverse Weather Image Restoration via Dual-Level Reinforcement Learning with High-Quality Cold Start
  3. 2026MeteoVerse: Unified Weather-Controllable Video World Model
  4. 2025IntrinsicWeather: Controllable Weather Editing in Intrinsic Space
  5. 2025Diffusion-Based Restoration for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection in Adverse Weather
  6. 2026PVRF: All-in-one Adverse Weather Removal via Prior-modulated and Velocity-constrained Rectified Flow
  7. 2026RealWeather: Realistic and Scene-Faithful Weather Translation with Driving World Models
  8. 2026Cyclone: Diffusion Model for Cycle-Consistent Weather Editing from Unpaired Driving Data