mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Visual Language Tracking with Multi-modal Interaction: A Robust Benchmark

arXiv 2409.08887 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2024cs.CV cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Language Tracking (VLT) enhances tracking by mitigating the limitations of relying solely on the visual modality, utilizing high-level semantic information through language. This integration of the language enables more advanced human-machine interaction. The essence of interaction is cognitive alignment, which typically requires multiple information exchanges, especially in the sequential decision-making process of VLT. However, current VLT benchmarks do not account for multi-round interactions during tracking. They provide only an initial text and bounding box (bbox) in the first frame, with no further interaction as tracking progresses, deviating from the original motivation of the VLT task. To address these limitations, we propose a novel and robust benchmark, VLT-MI (Visual Language Tracking with Multi-modal Interaction), which introduces multi-round interaction into the VLT task for the first time. (1) We generate diverse, multi-granularity texts for multi-round, multi-modal interaction based on existing mainstream VLT benchmarks using DTLLM-VLT, leveraging the world knowledge of LLMs. (2) We propose a new VLT interaction paradigm that achieves multi-round interaction through text updates and object recovery. When multiple tracking failures occur, we provide the tracker with more aligned texts and corrected bboxes through interaction, thereby expanding the scope of VLT downstream tasks. (3) We conduct comparative experiments on both traditional VLT benchmarks and VLT-MI, evaluating and analyzing the accuracy and robustness of trackers under the interactive paradigm. This work offers new insights and paradigms for the VLT task, enabling a fine-grained evaluation of multi-modal trackers. We believe this approach can be extended to additional datasets in the future, supporting broader evaluations and comparisons of video-language model capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2024.

Builds on

12 of 17 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018GOT-10k: A Large High-Diversity Benchmark for Generic Object Tracking in the Wildcited by 475
  2. 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 429
  3. 2021Towards More Flexible and Accurate Object Tracking with Natural Language: Algorithms and Benchmarkcited by 126
  4. 2023Towards Unified Token Learning for Vision-Language Trackingcited by 62
  5. 2023Joint Visual Grounding and Tracking with Natural Language Specificationcited by 59
  6. 2022Divert More Attention to Vision-Language Trackingcited by 47
  7. 2019Grounding-Tracking-Integrationcited by 32
  8. 2024Unifying Visual and Vision-Language Tracking via Contrastive Learningcited by 27
  9. 2024DTLLM-VLT: Diverse Text Generation for Visual Language Tracking Based on LLMcited by 24
  10. 2022Global Instance Tracking: Locating Target More Like Humanscited by 18
  11. 2024BioDrone: A Bionic Drone-based Single Object Tracking Benchmark for Robust Visioncited by 13
  12. 2022SOTVerse: A User-defined Task Space of Single Object Trackingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 8.

10 papers.