mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reverse-Engineering the Reader

arXiv 2410.13086 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous previous studies have sought to determine to what extent language models, pretrained on natural language text, can serve as useful models of human cognition. In this paper, we are interested in the opposite question: whether we can directly optimize a language model to be a useful cognitive model by aligning it to human psychometric data. To achieve this, we introduce a novel alignment technique in which we fine-tune a language model to implicitly optimize the parameters of a linear regressor that directly predicts humans' reading times of in-context linguistic units, e.g., phonemes, morphemes, or words, using surprisal estimates derived from the language model. Using words as a test case, we evaluate our technique across multiple model sizes and datasets and find that it improves language models' psychometric predictive power. However, we find an inverse relationship between psychometric power and a model's performance on downstream NLP tasks as well as its perplexity on held-out test data. While this latter trend has been observed before (Oh et al., 2022; Shain et al., 2024), we are the first to induce it by manipulating a model's alignment to psychometric data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

30 of 64 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  7. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  8. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  9. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  10. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  11. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
  12. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
18 more
  1. 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
  2. 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 115
  3. 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
  4. 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 75
  5. 2019ZuCo 2.0: A Dataset of Physiological Recordings During Natural Reading and Annotationcited by 65
  6. 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 63
  7. 2021Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Likecited by 52
  8. 2023Transformer-Based Language Model Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokenscited by 39
  9. 2024How to Compute the Probability of a Wordcited by 36
  10. 2024Preference Tuning For Toxicity Mitigation Generalizes Across Languagescited by 31
  11. 2024Leading Whitespaces of Language Models' Subword Vocabulary Pose a Confound for Calculating Word Probabilitiescited by 30
  12. 2021Multilingual Language Models Predict Human Reading Behaviorcited by 29
  13. 2019Deep Eyedentification: Biometric Identification using Micro-Movements of the Eyecited by 25
  14. 2022On the Effect of Anticipation on Reading Timescited by 18
  15. 2024On the Role of Context in Reading Time Predictioncited by 17
  16. 2023A Cross-Linguistic Pressure for Uniform Information Density in Word Ordercited by 16
  17. 2023Large GPT-like Models are Bad Babies: A Closer Look at the Relationship between Linguistic Competence and Psycholinguistic Measurescited by 11
  18. 2024EMTeC: A Corpus of Eye Movements on Machine-Generated Textscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.