A Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Fine-Grained Modeling of Reading Behavior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reading is a process that unfolds across space and time, alternating between fixations where a reader focuses on a specific point in space, and saccades where a reader rapidly shifts their focus to a new point. An ansatz of psycholinguistics is that modeling a reader's fixations and saccades yields insight into their online sentence processing. However, standard approaches to such modeling rely on aggregated eye-tracking measurements and models that impose strong assumptions, ignoring much of the spatio-temporal dynamics that occur during reading. In this paper, we propose a more general probabilistic model of reading behavior, based on a marked spatio-temporal point process, that captures not only how long fixations last, but also where they land in space and when they take place in time. The saccades are modeled using a Hawkes process, which captures how each fixation excites the probability of a new fixation occurring near it in time and space. The duration time of fixation events is modeled as a function of fixation-specific predictors convolved across time, thus capturing spillover effects. Empirically, our Hawkes process model exhibits a better fit to human saccades than baselines. With respect to fixation durations, we observe that incorporating contextual surprisal as a predictor results in only a marginal improvement in the model's predictive accuracy. This finding suggests that surprisal theory struggles to explain fine-grained eye movements.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.
Builds on
17 of 78 references.
References · 17
- 2022mGPT: Few-Shot Learners Go Multilingualcited by 142
- 2020On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension Behaviorcited by 119
- 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 113
- 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 77
- 2021Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Likecited by 52
- 2020Improving Natural Language Processing Tasks with Human Gaze-Guided Neural Attentioncited by 45
- 2017A Review of Self-Exciting Spatio-Temporal Point Processes and Their Applicationscited by 40
- 2024From Language Models over Tokens to Language Models over Characterscited by 31
- 2020Interpreting Attention Models with Human Visual Attention in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 29
- 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internallycited by 29
- 2024Generalized Measures of Anticipation and Responsivity in Online Language Processingcited by 24
- 2024On the Role of Context in Reading Time Predictioncited by 20
5 more
- 2020User-Dependent Neural Sequence Models for Continuous-Time Event Datacited by 17
- 2023ScanDL: A Diffusion Model for Generating Synthetic Scanpaths on Textscited by 14
- 2016Modeling Human Reading with Neural Attentioncited by 10
- 2015A space-time conditional intensity model for invasive meningococcal disease occurrencecited by 9
- 2024The Effect of Surprisal on Reading Times in Information Seeking and Repeated Readingcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal Theorycited by 2
- 2026Probing for Reading Timescited by 0
- 2026Revisiting the Estimation of Unigram Surprisal in Computational Psycholinguisticscited by 0
- 2026Revisiting the Estimation of Unigram Surprisal in Computational Psycholinguistics13 Oct 2026
- 2026On the Proper Treatment of Units in Surprisal Theory30 Apr 2026
- 2026Probing for Reading Times20 Apr 2026