Protecting Activity Sensing Data Privacy Using Hierarchical Information Dissociation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Smartphones and wearable devices have been integrated into our daily lives, offering personalized services. However, many apps become overprivileged as their collected sensing data contains unnecessary sensitive information. For example, mobile sensing data could reveal private attributes (e.g., gender and age) and unintended sensitive features (e.g., hand gestures when entering passwords). To prevent sensitive information leakage, existing methods must obtain private labels and users need to specify privacy policies. However, they only achieve limited control over information disclosure. In this work, we present Hippo to dissociate hierarchical information including private metadata and multi-grained activity information from the sensing data. Hippo achieves fine-grained control over the disclosure of sensitive information without requiring private labels. Specifically, we design a latent guidance-based diffusion model, which generates multi-grained versions of raw sensor data conditioned on hierarchical latent activity features. Hippo enables users to control the disclosure of sensitive information in sensing data, ensuring their privacy while preserving the necessary features to meet the utility requirements of applications. Hippo is the first unified model that achieves two goals: perturbing the sensitive attributes and controlling the disclosure of sensitive information in mobile sensing data. Extensive experiments show that Hippo can anonymize personal attributes and transform activity information at various resolutions across different types of sensing data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2024.
Builds on
16 of 42 references.
References · 16
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,781
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 144
- 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 126
- 2019Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributescited by 76
- 2018Mobile Sensor Data Anonymizationcited by 70
- 2019An Information Theoretic Interpretation to Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2020TIPRDC: Task-Independent Privacy-Respecting Data Crowdsourcing Framework for Deep Learning with Anonymized Intermediate Representationscited by 17
- 2023Understanding Multi-Turn Toxic Behaviors in Open-Domain Chatbotscited by 15
- 2023VSMask: Defending Against Voice Synthesis Attack via Real-Time Predictive Perturbationcited by 14
- 2022PrivTrace: Differentially Private Trajectory Synthesis by Adaptive Markov Modelcited by 13
4 more
- 2020DYSAN: Dynamically sanitizing motion sensor data against sensitive inferences through adversarial networkscited by 7
- 2017Replacement AutoEncoder: A Privacy-Preserving Algorithm for Sensory Data Analysiscited by 6
- 2017Adversarial Information Factorizationcited by 6
- 2023PhantomSound: Black-Box, Query-Efficient Audio Adversarial Attack via Split-Second Phoneme Injectioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024PrivDiffuser: Privacy-Guided Diffusion Model for Data Obfuscation in Sensor Networks
- 2024Private Data Leakage in Federated Human Activity Recognition for Wearable Healthcare Devices ↗
- 2025Differentially Private Feature Release for Wireless Sensing: Adaptive Privacy Budget Allocation on CSI Spectrograms ↗
- 2026PrivateHub: Contrastive Diffusion Model for Private Sensor-Intensive Environment Data Generation
- 2026OrganicHAR: Towards Activity Discovery in Organic Settings for Privacy Preserving Sensors Using Efficient Video Analysis
- 2026Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?
- 2026PrivacyAssist: A User-Centric Agent Framework for Detecting Privacy Inconsistencies in Android Apps ↗
- 2025CLOAK: Contrastive Guidance for Latent Diffusion-Based Data Obfuscation