mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Multi-Turn Toxic Behaviors in Open-Domain Chatbots

arXiv 2307.09579 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2023cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in natural language processing and machine learning have led to the development of chatbot models, such as ChatGPT, that can engage in conversational dialogue with human users. However, the ability of these models to generate toxic or harmful responses during a non-toxic multi-turn conversation remains an open research question. Existing research focuses on single-turn sentence testing, while we find that 82% of the individual non-toxic sentences that elicit toxic behaviors in a conversation are considered safe by existing tools. In this paper, we design a new attack, toxicbot, by fine-tuning a chatbot to engage in conversation with a target open-domain chatbot. The chatbot is fine-tuned with a collection of crafted conversation sequences. Particularly, each conversation begins with a sentence from a crafted prompt sentences dataset. Our extensive evaluation shows that open-domain chatbot models can be triggered to generate toxic responses in a multi-turn conversation. In the best scenario, toxicbot achieves a 67% activation rate. The conversation sequences in the fine-tuning stage help trigger the toxicity in a conversation, which allows the attack to bypass two defense methods. Our findings suggest that further research is needed to address chatbot toxicity in a dynamic interactive environment. The proposed toxicbot can be used by both industry and researchers to develop methods for detecting and mitigating toxic responses in conversational dialogue and improve the robustness of chatbots for end users.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.

Builds on

32 of 54 references.

References · 32

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  5. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  6. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  7. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
  8. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
  10. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  11. 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
  12. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 541
20 more
  1. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
  2. 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 470
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Pretrained Foundation Models: A History from BERT to ChatGPTcited by 368
  4. 2020The Pushshift Reddit Datasetcited by 292
  5. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 210
  6. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 207
  7. 2017Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluationcited by 206
  8. 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
  9. 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
  10. 2021Challenges in Detoxifying Language Modelscited by 169
  11. 2020Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skillscited by 131
  12. 2023Increasing Diversity While Maintaining Accuracy: Text Data Generation with Large Language Models and Human Interventionscited by 125
  13. 2023Explore, Establish, Exploit: Red Teaming Language Models from Scratchcited by 114
  14. 2023Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Modelscited by 55
  15. 2023Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMscited by 46
  16. 2022Why So Toxic? Measuring and Triggering Toxic Behavior in Open-Domain Chatbotscited by 33
  17. 2023Query-Efficient Black-Box Red Teaming via Bayesian Optimizationcited by 32
  18. 2019Acquiring Knowledge from Pre-trained Model to Neural Machine Translationcited by 30
  19. 2018Advancing the State of the Art in Open Domain Dialog Systems through the Alexa Prizecited by 29
  20. 2023VSMask: Defending Against Voice Synthesis Attack via Real-Time Predictive Perturbationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: