Comparative Study on Noise-Augmented Training and its Effect on Adversarial Robustness in ASR Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this study, we investigate whether noise-augmented training can concurrently improve adversarial robustness in automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. We conduct a comparative analysis of the adversarial robustness of four different ASR architectures, each trained under three different augmentation conditions: (1) background noise, speed variations, and reverberations; (2) speed variations only; (3) no data augmentation. We then evaluate the robustness of all resulting models against attacks with white-box or black-box adversarial examples. Our results demonstrate that noise augmentation not only enhances model performance on noisy speech but also improves the model's robustness to adversarial attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.
Builds on
36 of 51 references.
References · 36
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2015Listen, Attend and Spellcited by 542
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
- 2018SDR - half-baked or well done?cited by 420
24 more
- 2021SpeechBrain: A General-Purpose Speech Toolkitcited by 404
- 2015Attention-Based Models for Speech Recognitioncited by 400
- 2014Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 354
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
- 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
- 2023End-to-End Speech Recognition: A Surveycited by 127
- 2018Wave-U-Net: A Multi-Scale Neural Network for End-to-End Audio Source Separationcited by 125
- 2019Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 123
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
- 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
- 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 87
- 2018Adversarial Attacks Against Automatic Speech Recognition Systems via Psychoacoustic Hidingcited by 83
- 2019The Limitations of Adversarial Training and the Blind-Spot Attackcited by 63
- 2019SpecAugment on Large Scale Datasetscited by 60
- 2018Did you hear that? Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 48
- 2019Hear "No Evil", See "Kenansville": Efficient and Transferable Black-Box Attacks on Speech Recognition and Voice Identification Systemscited by 37
- 2019Are Adversarial Robustness and Common Perturbation Robustness Independent Attributes ?cited by 25
- 2021Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Speech Recognition Systemscited by 20
- 2022Recent improvements of ASR models in the face of adversarial attackscited by 13
- 2022There is more than one kind of robustness: Fooling Whisper with adversarial examplescited by 11
- 2019Improving Deep Speech Denoising by Noisy2Noisy Signal Mappingcited by 6
- 2021Robustifying automatic speech recognition by extracting slowly varying featurescited by 3
- 2023DistriBlock: Identifying adversarial audio samples by leveraging characteristics of the output distributioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.