Hitting the Gym: Reinforcement Learning Control of Exercise-Strengthened Biohybrid Robots in Simulation
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for robot locomotion and manipulation
Abstract (arXiv)
Animals can accomplish many incredible behavioral feats across a wide range of operational environments and scales that current robots struggle to match. One explanation for this performance gap is the extraordinary properties of the biological materials that comprise animals, such as muscle tissue. Using living muscle tissue as an actuator can endow robotic systems with highly desirable properties such as self-healing, compliance, and biocompatibility. Unlike traditional soft robotic actuators, living muscle biohybrid actuators exhibit unique adaptability, growing stronger with use. The dependency of a muscle's force output on its use history endows muscular organisms the ability to dynamically adapt to their environment, getting better at tasks over time. While muscle adaptability is a benefit to muscular organisms, it currently presents a challenge for biohybrid researchers: how does one design and control a robot whose actuators' force output changes over time? Here, we incorporate muscle adaptability into a many-muscle biohybrid robot design and modeling tool, leveraging reinforcement learning as both a co-design partner and system controller. As a controller, our learning agents coordinated the independent contraction of 42 muscles distributed on a lattice worm structure to successfully steer it towards eight distinct targets while incorporating muscle adaptability. As a co-design tool, our agents enable users to identify which muscles are important to accomplishing a given task. Our results show that adaptive agents outperform non-adaptive agents in terms of maximum rewards and training time. Together, these contributions can both enable the elucidation of muscle actuator adaptation and inform the design and modeling of adaptive, performant, many-muscle robots.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for robot locomotion and manipulation, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 6 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.
Builds on
6 of 34 references.
References · 6
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2020Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Surveycited by 373
- 2019Truly Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 69
- 2020Elastica: A compliant mechanics environment for soft robotic controlcited by 17
- 2023A Bioinspired Synthetic Nervous System Controller for Pick-and-Place Manipulationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Learning to Control Emulated Muscles in Real Robots: Towards Exploiting Bio-Inspired Actuator Morphology ↗
- 2026Physical Imitation Learning: Distilling Control Policies into Passive Elasticity
- 2024Deep Dive into Model-free Reinforcement Learning for Biological and Robotic Systems: Theory and Practice
- 2023Manipulator as a Tail: Promoting Dynamic Stability for Legged Locomotion
- 2026Reinforcement learning in linear embedding space unlocks generalizable control across soft robot configurations
- 2026Diff-Muscle: Efficient Learning for Musculoskeletal Robotic Table Tennis ↗
- 2026Towards Embodied AI with MuscleMimic: Unlocking full-body musculoskeletal motor learning at scale
- 2025How do trout regulate patterns of muscle contraction to optimize propulsive efficiency during steady swimming