ALIM: Adjusting Label Importance Mechanism for Noisy Partial Label Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Noisy partial label learning (noisy PLL) is an important branch of weakly supervised learning. Unlike PLL where the ground-truth label must conceal in the candidate label set, noisy PLL relaxes this constraint and allows the ground-truth label may not be in the candidate label set. To address this challenging problem, most of the existing works attempt to detect noisy samples and estimate the ground-truth label for each noisy sample. However, detection errors are unavoidable. These errors can accumulate during training and continuously affect model optimization. To this end, we propose a novel framework for noisy PLL with theoretical guarantees, called ``Adjusting Label Importance Mechanism (ALIM)''. It aims to reduce the negative impact of detection errors by trading off the initial candidate set and model outputs. ALIM is a plug-in strategy that can be integrated with existing PLL approaches. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method can achieve state-of-the-art performance on noisy PLL. textcolor[rgb]0.93,0.0,0.47Our code can be found in Supplementary Material.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2023.
Builds on
12 of 34 references.
References · 12
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
- 2017Learning from Ambiguously Labeled Face Imagescited by 29
- 2022PiCO+: Contrastive Label Disambiguation for Robust Partial Label Learningcited by 21
- 2021On the Robustness of Average Losses for Partial-Label Learningcited by 20
- 2020Robust Learning by Self-Transition for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithmscited by 12
- 2024Pseudo-labelling meets Label Smoothing for Noisy Partial Label Learningcited by 1
- 2024Pre-Trained Vision-Language Models as Partial Annotatorscited by 0
- 2024Learning from Complementary Featurescited by 0
- 2024Learning from Concealed Labelscited by 0
- 2025Exploiting the Potential Supervision Information of Clean Samples in Partial Label Learningcited by 0
- 2025Bridging Weakly-Supervised Learning and VLM Distillation: Noisy Partial Label Learning for Efficient Downstream Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026Holistic Optimal Label Selection for Robust Prompt Learning under Partial Labelscited by 0
- 2026Recent advances in weakly supervised learning: New supervision paradigms, assumption relaxations, and practical solutionscited by 0
- 2026Recent advances in weakly supervised learning: New supervision paradigms, assumption relaxations, and practical solutions7 Aug 2026
- 2026Holistic Optimal Label Selection for Robust Prompt Learning under Partial Labels8 Apr 2026
- 2025Bridging Weakly-Supervised Learning and VLM Distillation: Noisy Partial Label Learning for Efficient Downstream Adaptation3 Jun 2025
- 2025Exploiting the Potential Supervision Information of Clean Samples in Partial Label Learning14 May 2025
- 2025Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithms14 Feb 2025
- 2024Learning from Concealed Labels3 Dec 2024
- 2024Learning from Complementary Features27 Aug 2024
- 2024Pre-Trained Vision-Language Models as Partial Annotators23 May 2024
- 2024Pseudo-labelling meets Label Smoothing for Noisy Partial Label Learning7 Feb 2024