mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Limitations in Employing Natural Language Supervision for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition -- And Ways to Overcome Them

arXiv 2408.12023 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.CL cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-modal contrastive pre-training between natural language and other modalities, e.g., vision and audio, has demonstrated astonishing performance and effectiveness across a diverse variety of tasks and domains. In this paper, we investigate whether such natural language supervision can be used for wearable sensor based Human Activity Recognition (HAR), and discover that-surprisingly-it performs substantially worse than standard end-to-end training and self-supervision. We identify the primary causes for this as: sensor heterogeneity and the lack of rich, diverse text descriptions of activities. To mitigate their impact, we also develop strategies and assess their effectiveness through an extensive experimental evaluation. These strategies lead to significant increases in activity recognition, bringing performance closer to supervised and self-supervised training, while also enabling the recognition of unseen activities and cross modal retrieval of videos. Overall, our work paves the way for better sensor-language learning, ultimately leading to the development of foundational models for HAR using wearables.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2024.

Builds on

23 of 51 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  7. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  8. 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,175
  9. 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 719
  10. 2021VideoCLIP: Contrastive Pre-training for Zero-shot Video-Text Understandingcited by 602
  11. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 436
  12. 2022X-CLIP: End-to-End Multi-grained Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 280
11 more
  1. 2023Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewritescited by 217
  2. 2021Wav2CLIP: Learning Robust Audio Representations From CLIPcited by 213
  3. 2022Unified Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Label Spacecited by 194
  4. 2019Multi-task Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Detectioncited by 102
  5. 2023AnyMAL: An Efficient and Scalable Any-Modality Augmented Language Modelcited by 93
  6. 2022K-LITE: Learning Transferable Visual Models with External Knowledgecited by 79
  7. 2020Exploring Contrastive Learning in Human Activity Recognition for Healthcarecited by 75
  8. 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 65
  9. 2018Protecting Sensory Data against Sensitive Inferencescited by 45
  10. 2022IMU2CLIP: Multimodal Contrastive Learning for IMU Motion Sensors from Egocentric Videos and Textcited by 37
  11. 2023TENT: Connect Language Models with IoT Sensors for Zero-Shot Activity Recognitioncited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

10 papers.