Multiwinner Temporal Voting with Aversion to Change
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study two-stage committee elections where voters have dynamic preferences over candidates; at each stage, a committee is chosen under a given voting rule. We are interested in identifying a winning committee for the second stage that overlaps as much as possible with the first-stage committee. We show a full complexity dichotomy for the class of Thiele rules: this problem is tractable for Approval Voting (AV) and hard for all other Thiele rules (including, in particular, Proportional Approval Voting and the Chamberlin-Courant rule). We extend this dichotomy to the greedy variants of Thiele rules. We also explore this problem from a parameterized complexity perspective for several natural parameters. We complement the theory with experimental analysis: e.g., we investigate the average number of changes in the committee as a function of changes in voters' preferences and the role of ties.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.
Builds on
12 of 46 references.
References · 12
- 2020Multi-Winner Voting with Approval Preferencescited by 37
- 2023Proportional Aggregation of Preferences for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 17
- 2014Computational Aspects of Multi-Winner Approval Votingcited by 11
- 2022Online Approval Committee Electionscited by 9
- 2020When Votes Change and Committees Should (Not)cited by 7
- 2024Guide to Numerical Experiments on Elections in Computational Social Choicecited by 7
- 2021Parameterized Complexity of Multi-winner Determination: More Effort Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractabilitycited by 4
- 2022How to Sample Approval Elections?cited by 4
- 2019Adapting Stable Matchings to Evolving Preferencescited by 3
- 2023Ties in Multiwinner Approval Votingcited by 3
- 2017Robustness Among Multiwinner Voting Rulescited by 1
- 2022Approval with Runoffcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2024Temporal Elections: Welfare, Strategyproofness, and Proportionalitycited by 11
- 2024Temporal Fair Division of Indivisible Itemscited by 11
- 2025Strengthening Proportionality in Temporal Votingcited by 9
- 2025Online Fair Division with Additional Informationcited by 6
- 2025Not in My Backyard! Temporal Voting Over Public Chorescited by 6
- 2025Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair Divisioncited by 4
- 2026The Price of Proportional Representation in Temporal Votingcited by 3
- 2025Fairness in Repeated Matching: A Maximin Perspectivecited by 2
- 2026Online Fair Division with Budget Constraintscited by 0
- 2026Proportional Representation in Temporal Voting with Ranked Preferencescited by 0
- 2026Proportional Representation in Temporal Voting with Ranked Preferences24 Sep 2026
- 2026Online Fair Division with Budget Constraints25 Jul 2026
- 2026The Price of Proportional Representation in Temporal Voting11 May 2026
- 2025Fairness in Repeated Matching: A Maximin Perspective6 Oct 2025
- 2025Not in My Backyard! Temporal Voting Over Public Chores12 Aug 2025
- 2025Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair Division5 Aug 2025
- 2025Online Fair Division with Additional Information30 May 2025
- 2025Strengthening Proportionality in Temporal Voting28 May 2025
- 2024Temporal Fair Division of Indivisible Items18 Oct 2024
- 2024Temporal Elections: Welfare, Strategyproofness, and Proportionality24 Aug 2024