Parameterized Complexity of Multi-winner Determination: More Effort Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the parameterized complexity of winner determination problems for three prevalent k-committee selection rules, namely the minimax approval voting (MAV), the proportional approval voting (PAV), and the Chamberlin-Courant's approval voting (CCAV). It is known that these problems are computationally hard. Although they have been studied from the parameterized complexity point of view with respect to several natural parameters, many of them turned out to be W[1]-hard or W[2]-hard. Aiming at obtaining plentiful fixed-parameter algorithms, we revisit these problems by considering more natural single parameters, combined parameters, and structural parameters.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Multiwinner Temporal Voting with Aversion to Changecited by 10
- 2021DiRe Committee : Diversity and Representation Constraints in Multiwinner Electionscited by 3
- 2026Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Thiele Voting Rules with Voter Interval Preferencescited by 2
- 2026Algorithms for Structured Elections under Thiele Voting Rulescited by 0
- 2026Algorithms for Structured Elections under Thiele Voting Rules30 Jul 2026
- 2026Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Thiele Voting Rules with Voter Interval Preferences7 Apr 2026
- 2024Multiwinner Temporal Voting with Aversion to Change20 Aug 2024
- 2021DiRe Committee : Diversity and Representation Constraints in Multiwinner Elections15 Jul 2021