mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

S-RAF: A Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework for Responsible Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2408.08584 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology advances, ensuring the robustness and safety of AI-driven systems has become paramount. However, varying perceptions of robustness among AI developers create misaligned evaluation metrics, complicating the assessment and certification of safety-critical and complex AI systems such as autonomous driving (AD) agents. To address this challenge, we introduce Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework (S-RAF) for autonomous driving. S-RAF leverages the CARLA Driving simulator to rigorously assess AD agents across diverse conditions, including faulty sensors, environmental changes, and complex traffic situations. By quantifying robustness and its relationship with other safety-critical factors, such as carbon emissions, S-RAF aids developers and stakeholders in building safe and responsible driving agents, and streamlining safety certification processes. Furthermore, S-RAF offers significant advantages, such as reduced testing costs, and the ability to explore edge cases that may be unsafe to test in the real world. The code for this framework is available here: https://github.com/cognitive-robots/rai-leaderboard

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2024.

Builds on

20 of 43 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  4. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  5. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  6. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  7. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  8. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
  9. 2019Learning by Cheatingcited by 361
  10. 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 262
  11. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
  12. 2022Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformercited by 211
8 more
  1. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  2. 2021NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 174
  3. 2018GAN Augmentation: Augmenting Training Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 107
  4. 2021Explanations in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 80
  5. 2022Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AIcited by 58
  6. 2022A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithmscited by 30
  7. 2024A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness Evaluationscited by 6
  8. 2021Robustness testing of AI systems: A case study for traffic sign recognitioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.