Robustness testing of AI systems: A case study for traffic sign recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the last years, AI systems, in particular neural networks, have seen a tremendous increase in performance, and they are now used in a broad range of applications. Unlike classical symbolic AI systems, neural networks are trained using large data sets and their inner structure containing possibly billions of parameters does not lend itself to human interpretation. As a consequence, it is so far not feasible to provide broad guarantees for the correct behaviour of neural networks during operation if they process input data that significantly differ from those seen during training. However, many applications of AI systems are security- or safety-critical, and hence require obtaining statements on the robustness of the systems when facing unexpected events, whether they occur naturally or are induced by an attacker in a targeted way. As a step towards developing robust AI systems for such applications, this paper presents how the robustness of AI systems can be practically examined and which methods and metrics can be used to do so. The robustness testing methodology is described and analysed for the example use case of traffic sign recognition in autonomous driving.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2021.
Builds on
13 of 25 references.
References · 13
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 262
- 2017CURE-TSR: Challenging Unreal and Real Environments for Traffic Sign Recognitioncited by 32
- 2019Traffic Sign Detection under Challenging Conditions: A Deeper Look Into Performance Variations and Spectral Characteristicscited by 14
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Trust in AI: Interpretability is not necessary or sufficient, while black-box interaction is necessary and sufficientcited by 13
- 2024S-RAF: A Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework for Responsible Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
- 2021Comparing the Machine Readability of Traffic Sign Pictograms in Austria and Germanycited by 0
- 2024S-RAF: A Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework for Responsible Autonomous Driving16 Aug 2024
- 2022Trust in AI: Interpretability is not necessary or sufficient, while black-box interaction is necessary and sufficient10 Feb 2022
- 2021Comparing the Machine Readability of Traffic Sign Pictograms in Austria and Germany6 Sep 2021