Enhancing Adversarial Attacks via Parameter Adaptive Adversarial Attack
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent times, the swift evolution of adversarial attacks has captured widespread attention, particularly concerning their transferability and other performance attributes. These techniques are primarily executed at the sample level, frequently overlooking the intrinsic parameters of models. Such neglect suggests that the perturbations introduced in adversarial samples might have the potential for further reduction. Given the essence of adversarial attacks is to impair model integrity with minimal noise on original samples, exploring avenues to maximize the utility of such perturbations is imperative. Against this backdrop, we have delved into the complexities of adversarial attack algorithms, dissecting the adversarial process into two critical phases: the Directional Supervision Process (DSP) and the Directional Optimization Process (DOP). While DSP determines the direction of updates based on the current samples and model parameters, it has been observed that existing model parameters may not always be conducive to adversarial attacks. The impact of models on adversarial efficacy is often overlooked in current research, leading to the neglect of DSP. We propose that under certain conditions, fine-tuning model parameters can significantly enhance the quality of DSP. For the first time, we propose that under certain conditions, fine-tuning model parameters can significantly improve the quality of the DSP. We provide, for the first time, rigorous mathematical definitions and proofs for these conditions, and introduce multiple methods for fine-tuning model parameters within DSP. Our extensive experiments substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed P3A method. Our code is accessible at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/P3A-A12C/
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2024.
Builds on
22 of 31 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
10 more
- 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
- 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 440
- 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 352
- 2022Frequency Domain Model Augmentation for Adversarial Attackcited by 128
- 2022Improving Adversarial Transferability via Neuron Attribution-Based Attackscited by 92
- 2019PhysGAN: Generating Physical-World-Resilient Adversarial Examples for Autonomous Drivingcited by 72
- 2022LGV: Boosting Adversarial Example Transferability from Large Geometric Vicinitycited by 39
- 2021Adversarial Attacks on Deep Models for Financial Transaction Recordscited by 24
- 2019Detection of Face Recognition Adversarial Attackscited by 15
- 2023Understanding and Improving Ensemble Adversarial Defensecited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.