Leveraging Information Consistency in Frequency and Spatial Domain for Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial examples are a key method to exploit deep neural networks. Using gradient information, such examples can be generated in an efficient way without altering the victim model. Recent frequency domain transformation has further enhanced the transferability of such adversarial examples, such as spectrum simulation attack. In this work, we investigate the effectiveness of frequency domain-based attacks, aligning with similar findings in the spatial domain. Furthermore, such consistency between the frequency and spatial domains provides insights into how gradient-based adversarial attacks induce perturbations across different domains, which is yet to be explored. Hence, we propose a simple, effective, and scalable gradient-based adversarial attack algorithm leveraging the information consistency in both frequency and spatial domains. We evaluate the algorithm for its effectiveness against different models. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our algorithm achieves state-of-the-art results compared to other gradient-based algorithms. Our code is available at: https://github.com/LMBTough/FSA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.
Builds on
32 of 41 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
20 more
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
- 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 442
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
- 2022Frequency Domain Model Augmentation for Adversarial Attackcited by 130
- 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
- 2019On the Effectiveness of Low Frequency Perturbationscited by 56
- 2021AdvDrop: Adversarial Attack to DNNs by Dropping Informationcited by 56
- 2023DANAA: Towards transferable attacks with double adversarial neuron attributioncited by 7
- 2023MFABA: A More Faithful and Accelerated Boundary-based Attribution Method for Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2024GE-AdvGAN: Improving the transferability of adversarial samples by gradient editing-based adversarial generative modelcited by 7
- 2024Benchmarking Transferable Adversarial Attackscited by 5
- 2024Enhancing Model Interpretability with Local Attribution over Global Explorationcited by 4
- 2024Enhancing Adversarial Attacks via Parameter Adaptive Adversarial Attackcited by 2
- 2024DMS: Addressing Information Loss with More Steps for Pragmatic Adversarial Attackscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.