Approximating Discrimination Within Models When Faced With Several Non-Binary Sensitive Attributes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Discrimination mitigation within machine learning (ML) models could be complicated because multiple factors may be interwoven hierarchically and historically. Yet few existing fairness measures can capture the discrimination level within ML models in the face of multiple sensitive attributes (SAs). To bridge this gap, we propose a fairness measure based on distances between sets from a manifold perspective, named as 'Harmonic Fairness measure via Manifolds (HFM)' with two optional versions, which can deal with a fine-grained discrimination evaluation for several SAs of multiple values. Because directly computing HFM may be costly, to accelerate its subprocedure -- the computation of distances of sets, we further propose two approximation algorithms named 'Approximation of distance between sets for one sensitive attribute with multiple values (ApproxDist)' and 'Approximation of extended distance between sets for several sensitive attributes with multiple values (ExtendDist)' to respectively resolve bias evaluation of one single SA with multiple values and that of several SAs with multiple values. Moreover, we provide an algorithmic effectiveness analysis for ApproxDist under certain assumptions to explain how well it could work. The empirical results demonstrate that our proposed fairness measure HFM is valid and approximation algorithms (i.e. ApproxDist and ExtendDist) are effective and efficient.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.
Builds on
29 of 49 references.
References · 29
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2019Maintaining Discrimination and Fairness in Class Incremental Learningcited by 281
- 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
- 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
17 more
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
- 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
- 2020Fairness by Learning Orthogonal Disentangled Representationscited by 76
- 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
- 2017On Formalizing Fairness in Prediction with Machine Learningcited by 65
- 2021Fairness via Representation Neutralizationcited by 63
- 2021Fair Feature Distillation for Visual Recognitioncited by 59
- 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
- 2018FNNC: Achieving Fairness through Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2020Gender Slopes: Counterfactual Fairness for Computer Vision Models by Attribute Manipulationcited by 36
- 2021Object-aware Contrastive Learning for Debiased Scene Representationcited by 34
- 2022FairGBM: Gradient Boosting with Fairness Constraintscited by 25
- 2021Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning Modelscited by 16
- 2021InfoFair: Information-Theoretic Intersectional Fairnesscited by 15
- 2024Measuring Model-Induced Discrimination via Efficient Fairness Approximationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.