Physics-Assisted Reduced-Order Modeling for Identifying Dominant Features of Transonic Buffet
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transonic buffet is a flow instability phenomenon that arises from the interaction between the shock wave and the separated boundary layer. This flow phenomenon is considered to be highly detrimental during flight and poses a significant risk to the structural strength and fatigue life of aircraft. Up to now, there has been a lack of an accurate, efficient, and intuitive metric to predict buffet and impose a feasible constraint on aerodynamic design. In this paper, a Physics-Assisted Variational Autoencoder (PAVAE) is proposed to identify dominant features of transonic buffet, which combines unsupervised reduced-order modeling with additional physical information embedded via a buffet classifier. Specifically, four models with various weights adjusting the contribution of the classifier are trained, so as to investigate the impact of buffet information on the latent space. Statistical results reveal that buffet state can be determined exactly with just one latent space when a proper weight of classifier is chosen. The dominant latent space further reveals a strong relevance with the key flow features located in the boundary layers downstream of shock. Based on this identification, the displacement thickness at 80% chordwise location is proposed as a metric for buffet prediction. This metric achieves an accuracy of 98.5% in buffet state classification, which is more reliable than the existing separation metric used in design. The proposed method integrates the benefits of feature extraction, flow reconstruction, and buffet prediction into a unified framework, demonstrating its potential in low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional flow data and interpreting the "black box" neural network.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.
Builds on
11 of 55 references.
References · 11
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2015An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 510
- 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
- 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
- 2021Towards extraction of orthogonal and parsimonious non-linear modes from turbulent flowscited by 44
- 2022Physics-aware Reduced-order Modeling of Transonic Flow via β-Variational Autoencodercited by 15
- 2022Parametric Generative Schemes with Geometric Constraints for Encoding and Synthesizing Airfoilscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.