Counterfactual Explanations with Probabilistic Guarantees on their Robustness to Model Change
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) guide users on how to adjust inputs to machine learning models to achieve desired outputs. While existing research primarily addresses static scenarios, real-world applications often involve data or model changes, potentially invalidating previously generated CFEs and rendering user-induced input changes ineffective. Current methods addressing this issue often support only specific models or change types, require extensive hyperparameter tuning, or fail to provide probabilistic guarantees on CFE robustness to model changes. This paper proposes a novel approach for generating CFEs that provides probabilistic guarantees for any model and change type, while offering interpretable and easy-to-select hyperparameters. We establish a theoretical framework for probabilistically defining robustness to model change and demonstrate how our BetaRCE method directly stems from it. BetaRCE is a post-hoc method applied alongside a chosen base CFE generation method to enhance the quality of the explanation beyond robustness. It facilitates a transition from the base explanation to a more robust one with user-adjusted probability bounds. Through experimental comparisons with baselines, we show that BetaRCE yields robust, most plausible, and closest to baseline counterfactual explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2024.
Builds on
25 of 41 references.
References · 25
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
- 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
- 2020GANterfactual - Counterfactual Explanations for Medical Non-Experts using Generative Adversarial Learningcited by 50
- 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
- 2023Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 45
- 2021Evaluating Robustness of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 41
13 more
- 2022Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 40
- 2021A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual Explanationscited by 38
- 2022On the Robustness of Sparse Counterfactual Explanations to Adverse Perturbationscited by 32
- 2024Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 29
- 2022Formalising the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2023Finding Regions of Counterfactual Explanations via Robust Optimizationcited by 19
- 2022Robust Bayesian Recoursecited by 18
- 2023Generating robust counterfactual explanationscited by 13
- 2023Robustness Implies Fairness in Causal Algorithmic Recoursecited by 12
- 2022"Explain it in the Same Way!" -- Model-Agnostic Group Fairness of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 9
- 2024A multi-criteria approach for selecting an explanation from the set of counterfactuals produced by an ensemble of explainerscited by 7
- 2024Rigorous Probabilistic Guarantees for Robust Counterfactual Explanationscited by 6
- 2024Generally-Occurring Model Change for Robust Counterfactual Explanationscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.
10 papers.
- 2025Counterfactual Explanations for Model Ensembles Using Entropic Risk Measurescited by 4
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Durable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 3
- 2025Explaining Concept Drift through the Evolution of Group Counterfactualscited by 2
- 2026PAR: Plausibility-aware Amortized Recourse Generationcited by 2
- 2026Provably Robust Bayesian Counterfactual Explanations under Model Changescited by 1
- 2026The Impact of Machine Learning Uncertainty on the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 0
- 2026A Probabilistic Consensus-Driven Approach for Robust Counterfactual Explanationscited by 0
- 2026Counterfactual Explanations Under Concept Driftcited by 0
- 2026Density-Guided Robust Counterfactual Explanations on Tabular Data under Model Multiplicitycited by 0
- 2026Robust to Which Model Change? A Unified Evaluation of Robust Counterfactual Explanationscited by 0
- 2026Robust to Which Model Change? A Unified Evaluation of Robust Counterfactual Explanations25 Sep 2026
- 2026Density-Guided Robust Counterfactual Explanations on Tabular Data under Model Multiplicity29 May 2026
- 2026Counterfactual Explanations Under Concept Drift17 May 2026
- 2026A Probabilistic Consensus-Driven Approach for Robust Counterfactual Explanations19 Apr 2026
- 2026PAR: Plausibility-aware Amortized Recourse Generation24 Jan 2026
- 2026Provably Robust Bayesian Counterfactual Explanations under Model Changes23 Jan 2026
- 2026The Impact of Machine Learning Uncertainty on the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanations20 Jan 2026
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Durable Algorithmic Recourse26 Sep 2025
- 2025Explaining Concept Drift through the Evolution of Group Counterfactuals11 Sep 2025
- 2025Counterfactual Explanations for Model Ensembles Using Entropic Risk Measures11 Mar 2025