mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning in Content Ranking Optimization

arXiv 2408.04251 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a typical e-commerce setting, Content Ranking Optimization (CRO) mechanisms are employed to surface content on the search page to fulfill customers' shopping missions. CRO commonly utilizes models such as contextual deep bandits model to independently rank content at different positions, e.g., one optimizer dedicated to organic search results and another to sponsored results. However, this regional optimization approach does not necessarily translate to whole page optimization, e.g., maximizing revenue at the top of the page may inadvertently diminish the revenue of lower positions. In this paper, we propose a reinforcement learning based method for whole page ranking to jointly optimize across all positions by: 1) shifting from position level optimization to whole page level optimization to achieve an overall optimized ranking; 2) applying reinforcement learning to optimize for the cumulative rewards instead of the instant reward. We formulate page level CRO as a cooperative Multi-agent Markov Decision Process , and address it with the novel Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (MADDPG) model. MADDPG supports a flexible and scalable joint optimization framework by adopting a "centralized training and decentralized execution" approach. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MADDPG scales to a 2.5 billion action space in the public Mujoco environment, and outperforms the deep bandits modeling by 25.7% on the offline CRO data set from a leading e-commerce company. We foresee that this novel multi-agent optimization is applicable to similar joint optimization problems in the field of information retrieval.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2024.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  3. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  4. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  5. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  6. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  7. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  8. 2018Deep Interest Evolution Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 336
  9. 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
  10. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Page-wise Recommendationscited by 99
  11. 2017Action Branching Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  12. 2019Shapley Q-value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Gamescited by 71
5 more
  1. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning for List-wise Recommendationscited by 35
  2. 2018An Efficient Bandit Algorithm for Realtime Multivariate Optimizationcited by 34
  3. 2022Guarantees for Epsilon-Greedy Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximationcited by 29
  4. 2020t-Soft Update of Target Network for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  5. 2019Aggregating E-commerce Search Results from Heterogeneous Sources via Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.