PushPull-Net: Inhibition-driven ResNet robust to image corruptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a novel computational unit, termed PushPull-Conv, in the first layer of a ResNet architecture, inspired by the anti-phase inhibition phenomenon observed in the primary visual cortex. This unit redefines the traditional convolutional layer by implementing a pair of complementary filters: a trainable push kernel and its counterpart, the pull kernel. The push kernel (analogous to traditional convolution) learns to respond to specific stimuli, while the pull kernel reacts to the same stimuli but of opposite contrast. This configuration enhances stimulus selectivity and effectively inhibits response in regions lacking preferred stimuli. This effect is attributed to the push and pull kernels, which produce responses of comparable magnitude in such regions, thereby neutralizing each other. The incorporation of the PushPull-Conv into ResNets significantly increases their robustness to image corruption. Our experiments with benchmark corruption datasets show that the PushPull-Conv can be combined with other data augmentation techniques to further improve model robustness. We set a new robustness benchmark on ResNet50 achieving an mCE of 49.95% on ImageNet-C when combining PRIME augmentation with PushPull inhibition.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2024.
Builds on
25 of 44 references.
References · 25
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
13 more
- 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 390
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
- 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
- 2018Bilateral Adversarial Training: Towards Fast Training of More Robust Models Against Adversarial Attackscited by 48
- 2021PRIME: A few primitives can boost robustness to common corruptionscited by 40
- 2020An Effective Anti-Aliasing Approach for Residual Networkscited by 23
- 2023A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptionscited by 20
- 2024Fourier-basis Functions to Bridge Augmentation Gap: Rethinking Frequency Augmentation in Image Classificationcited by 18
- 2021Group-wise Inhibition based Feature Regularization for Robust Classificationcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.