mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding How Blind Users Handle Object Recognition Errors: Strategies and Challenges

arXiv 2408.03303 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Object recognition technologies hold the potential to support blind and low-vision people in navigating the world around them. However, the gap between benchmark performances and practical usability remains a significant challenge. This paper presents a study aimed at understanding blind users' interaction with object recognition systems for identifying and avoiding errors. Leveraging a pre-existing object recognition system, URCam, fine-tuned for our experiment, we conducted a user study involving 12 blind and low-vision participants. Through in-depth interviews and hands-on error identification tasks, we gained insights into users' experiences, challenges, and strategies for identifying errors in camera-based assistive technologies and object recognition systems. During interviews, many participants preferred independent error review, while expressing apprehension toward misrecognitions. In the error identification task, participants varied viewpoints, backgrounds, and object sizes in their images to avoid and overcome errors. Even after repeating the task, participants identified only half of the errors, and the proportion of errors identified did not significantly differ from their first attempts. Based on these insights, we offer implications for designing accessible interfaces tailored to the needs of blind and low-vision users in identifying object recognition errors.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2024.

Builds on

18 of 94 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  5. 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
  6. 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
  7. 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
  8. 2022Guidelines and Evaluation of Clinical Explainable AI in Medical Image Analysiscited by 34
  9. 2020Assessing Image Quality Issues for Real-World Problemscited by 28
  10. 2024Investigating Use Cases of AI-Powered Scene Description Applications for Blind and Low Vision Peoplecited by 24
  11. 2020A Study on the Challenges of Using Robotics Simulators for Testingcited by 10
  12. 2020Crowdsourcing the Perception of Machine Teachingcited by 9
6 more
  1. 2023Explaining CLIP's performance disparities on data from blind/low vision userscited by 7
  2. 2022Blind Users Accessing Their Training Images in Teachable Object Recognizerscited by 6
  3. 2020Pedestrian Detection with Wearable Cameras for the Blind: A Two-way Perspectivecited by 5
  4. 2022What's Different between Visual Question Answering for Machine "Understanding" Versus for Accessibility?cited by 5
  5. 2022From the Lab to People's Home: Lessons from Accessing Blind Participants' Interactions via Smart Glasses in Remote Studiescited by 2
  6. 2023Helping Visually Impaired People Take Better Quality Picturescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.