mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SEAS: Self-Evolving Adversarial Safety Optimization for Large Language Models

arXiv 2408.02632 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Safety of self-evolving systems

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance in capability and influence, ensuring their security and preventing harmful outputs has become crucial. A promising approach to address these concerns involves training models to automatically generate adversarial prompts for red teaming. However, the evolving subtlety of vulnerabilities in LLMs challenges the effectiveness of current adversarial methods, which struggle to specifically target and explore the weaknesses of these models. To tackle these challenges, we introduce the Self-Evolving Adversarial Safety (SEAS) optimization framework, which enhances security by leveraging data generated by the model itself. SEAS operates through three iterative stages: Initialization, Attack, and Adversarial Optimization, refining both the Red Team and Target models to improve robustness and safety. This framework reduces reliance on manual testing and significantly enhances the security capabilities of LLMs. Our contributions include a novel adversarial framework, a comprehensive safety dataset, and after three iterations, the Target model achieves a security level comparable to GPT-4, while the Red Team model shows a marked increase in attack success rate (ASR) against advanced models. Our code and datasets are released at https://SEAS-LLM.github.io/.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety of self-evolving systems, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2024.

Builds on

35 of 51 references.

References · 35

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  8. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  9. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  10. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  11. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
  12. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
23 more
  1. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
  2. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
  3. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  4. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  5. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  6. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  7. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  8. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  9. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  10. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 520
  11. 2021Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate Generationcited by 384
  12. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
  13. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreakercited by 337
  14. 2024We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?cited by 281
  15. 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 213
  16. 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 189
  17. 2023MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teamingcited by 161
  18. 2024ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teamingcited by 96
  19. 2024Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Modelscited by 83
  20. 2024SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safetycited by 75
  21. 2024CS-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Large Language Models towards Computer Science Masterycited by 30
  22. 2023Goal-Oriented Prompt Attack and Safety Evaluation for LLMscited by 23
  23. 2023Bridging the KB-Text Gap: Leveraging Structured Knowledge-aware Pre-training for KBQAcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attacks
  2. 2025Adversarial Attack-Defense Co-Evolution for LLM Safety Alignment via Tree-Group Dual-Aware Search and Optimization
  3. 2025A Self-Improving Architecture for Dynamic Safety in Large Language Models
  4. 2025Data Security in Large Language Models: Risks, Defense, and Directions
  5. 2025Adversarial Alignment for LLMs Requires Simpler, Reproducible, and More Measurable Objectives
  6. 2025Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Agent Safety
  7. 2025TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  8. 2026OpenRT: An Open-Source Red Teaming Framework for Multimodal LLMs