mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Self-Improving Architecture for Dynamic Safety in Large Language Models

arXiv 2511.07645 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Safety of self-evolving systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on static, pre-deployment safety mechanisms that cannot adapt to adversarial threats discovered after release. Objective: To design a software architecture enabling LLM-based systems to autonomously detect safety failures and synthesize defense policies at runtime, without retraining or manual intervention. Method: We propose the Self-Improving Safety Framework (SISF), grounded in the MAPE-K reference model. The framework couples a target LLM with a feedback loop: an Adjudicator detects breaches, a Policy Synthesis Module generates dual-mechanism defense policies (heuristic and semantic), and a Warden enforces them. We conducted seven experiments (10,061 evaluations) across four model families. Results: Across five reproducibility trials, SISF achieved a mean Attack Success Rate (ASR) of 0.27% (+/-0.15%), autonomously generating 240 policies per trial. Cross-model evaluation confirmed deployment portability. A held-out test showed a 68.5% proactive interception rate on unseen attacks. Stacked behind Llama Guard 4, the combined defense reduced residual ASR from 7.88% to 0.00%. Ablation confirmed both heuristic and semantic policy types are architecturally required. Conclusion: Self-adaptive architecture is a viable approach to LLM safety. SISF achieves sub-1% ASR through synchronous output monitoring, progressively shifting enforcement to fast, local Warden policies via the MAPE-K loop, offering a new pattern for building resilient AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety of self-evolving systems, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  5. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  6. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  7. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
  8. 2024An Analysis of MLOps Architectures: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EvoSafeHarness: Evolving Model- and Domain-Specific Harnesses for Securing Agents
  2. 2025MetaSC: Test-Time Safety Specification Optimization for Language Models
  3. 2026CourtGuard: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Zero-Shot Policy Adaptation in LLM Safety
  4. 2026SafeHarness: Lifecycle-Integrated Security Architecture for LLM-based Agent Deployment
  5. 2025Taxonomy-Adaptive Moderation Model with Robust Guardrails for Large Language Models
  6. 2025RSafe: Incentivizing proactive reasoning to build robust and adaptive LLM safeguards
  7. 2026Security in the Fine-Tuning Lifecycle of Large Language Models: Threats, Defenses,Evaluation, and Future Directions
  8. 2024Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey