mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features

arXiv 2408.01808 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.SDcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Extensive research has revealed that adversarial examples (AE) pose a significant threat to voice-controllable smart devices. Recent studies have proposed black-box adversarial attacks that require only the final transcription from an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system. However, these attacks typically involve many queries to the ASR, resulting in substantial costs. Moreover, AE-based adversarial audio samples are susceptible to ASR updates. In this paper, we identify the root cause of these limitations, namely the inability to construct AE attack samples directly around the decision boundary of deep learning (DL) models. Building on this observation, we propose ALIF, the first black-box adversarial linguistic feature-based attack pipeline. We leverage the reciprocal process of text-to-speech (TTS) and ASR models to generate perturbations in the linguistic embedding space where the decision boundary resides. Based on the ALIF pipeline, we present the ALIF-OTL and ALIF-OTA schemes for launching attacks in both the digital domain and the physical playback environment on four commercial ASRs and voice assistants. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that ALIF-OTL and -OTA significantly improve query efficiency by 97.7% and 73.3%, respectively, while achieving competitive performance compared to existing methods. Notably, ALIF-OTL can generate an attack sample with only one query. Furthermore, our test-of-time experiment validates the robustness of our approach against ASR updates.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2024.

Builds on

21 of 52 references.

References · 21

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  3. 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 800
  4. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  5. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  6. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
  7. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
  8. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
  9. 2021A Survey on Neural Speech Synthesiscited by 182
  10. 2018Adversarial Attacks Against Automatic Speech Recognition Systems via Psychoacoustic Hidingcited by 83
  11. 2017DolphinAtack: Inaudible Voice Commandscited by 65
  12. 2018CommanderSong: A Systematic Approach for Practical Adversarial Voice Recognitioncited by 63
9 more
  1. 2018Robust Audio Adversarial Example for a Physical Attackcited by 42
  2. 2018Targeted Adversarial Examples for Black Box Audio Systemscited by 41
  3. 2019Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Speech Recognition Systemscited by 41
  4. 2021The Dimpled Manifold Model of Adversarial Examples in Machine Learningcited by 41
  5. 2019Practical Hidden Voice Attacks against Speech and Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 34
  6. 2019Hybrid Batch Attacks: Finding Black-box Adversarial Examples with Limited Queriescited by 33
  7. 2021Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Commercial Speech Platforms with Minimal Informationcited by 25
  8. 2019Imperio: Robust Over-the-Air Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognition Systemscited by 16
  9. 2021Universal 3-Dimensional Perturbations for Black-Box Attacks on Video Recognition Systemscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.