mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

dopanim: A Dataset of Doppelganger Animals with Noisy Annotations from Multiple Humans

arXiv 2407.20950 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human annotators typically provide annotated data for training machine learning models, such as neural networks. Yet, human annotations are subject to noise, impairing generalization performances. Methodological research on approaches counteracting noisy annotations requires corresponding datasets for a meaningful empirical evaluation. Consequently, we introduce a novel benchmark dataset, dopanim, consisting of about 15,750 animal images of 15 classes with ground truth labels. For approximately 10,500 of these images, 20 humans provided over 52,000 annotations with an accuracy of circa 67%. Its key attributes include (1) the challenging task of classifying doppelganger animals, (2) human-estimated likelihoods as annotations, and (3) annotator metadata. We benchmark well-known multi-annotator learning approaches using seven variants of this dataset and outline further evaluation use cases such as learning beyond hard class labels and active learning. Our dataset and a comprehensive codebase are publicly available to emulate the data collection process and to reproduce all empirical results.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.

Builds on

28 of 75 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  5. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  6. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  7. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  8. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
  9. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  10. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  11. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
  12. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
16 more
  1. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  2. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  3. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  4. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  5. 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
  6. 2020Disentangling Human Error from the Ground Truth in Segmentation of Medical Imagescited by 58
  7. 2017Learning From Noisy Singly-labeled Datacited by 50
  8. 2022Eliciting and Learning with Soft Labels from Every Annotatorcited by 43
  9. 2022Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimationcited by 43
  10. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  11. 2020Learning from Crowds by Modeling Common Confusionscited by 32
  12. 2021A Survey on Cost Types, Interaction Schemes, and Annotator Performance Models in Selection Algorithms for Active Learning in Classificationcited by 17
  13. 2021Learning from Multiple Noisy Partial Labelerscited by 14
  14. 2023Deep Learning From Crowdsourced Labels: Coupled Cross-entropy Minimization, Identifiability, and Regularizationcited by 12
  15. 2023Multi-annotator Deep Learning: A Probabilistic Framework for Classificationcited by 8
  16. 2024Annot-Mix: Learning with Noisy Class Labels from Multiple Annotators via a Mixup Extensioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.