mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PEFT-U: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for User Personalization

arXiv 2407.18078 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has heralded a new era of human-AI interaction. These sophisticated models, exemplified by Chat-GPT and its successors, have exhibited remarkable capabilities in language understanding. However, as these LLMs have undergone exponential growth, a crucial dimension that remains understudied is the personalization of these models. Large foundation models such as GPT-3 etc. focus on creating a universal model that serves a broad range of tasks and users. This approach emphasizes the model's generalization capabilities, treating users as a collective rather than as distinct individuals. While practical for many common applications, this one-size-fits-all approach often fails to address the rich tapestry of human diversity and individual needs. To explore this issue we introduce the PEFT-U Benchmark: a new dataset for building and evaluating NLP models for user personalization. datasetname consists of a series of user-centered tasks containing diverse and individualized expressions where the preferences of users can potentially differ for the same input. Using PEFT-U, we explore the challenge of efficiently personalizing LLMs to accommodate user-specific preferences in the context of diverse user-centered tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2024.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  5. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  6. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
  7. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  8. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  9. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
  10. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
  11. 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
  12. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
7 more
  1. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
  2. 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 140
  3. 2023Teach LLMs to Personalize -- An Approach inspired by Writing Educationcited by 48
  4. 2021Did they answer? Subjective acts and intents in conversational discoursecited by 22
  5. 2020Six Attributes of Unhealthy Conversationcited by 19
  6. 2021The Origin and Value of Disagreement Among Data Labelers: A Case Study of the Individual Difference in Hate Speech Annotationcited by 15
  7. 2019Humor in Word Embeddings: Cockamamie Gobbledegook for Nincompoopscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 4.

11 papers.