PEFT-U: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for User Personalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recent emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has heralded a new era of human-AI interaction. These sophisticated models, exemplified by Chat-GPT and its successors, have exhibited remarkable capabilities in language understanding. However, as these LLMs have undergone exponential growth, a crucial dimension that remains understudied is the personalization of these models. Large foundation models such as GPT-3 etc. focus on creating a universal model that serves a broad range of tasks and users. This approach emphasizes the model's generalization capabilities, treating users as a collective rather than as distinct individuals. While practical for many common applications, this one-size-fits-all approach often fails to address the rich tapestry of human diversity and individual needs. To explore this issue we introduce the PEFT-U Benchmark: a new dataset for building and evaluating NLP models for user personalization. datasetname consists of a series of user-centered tasks containing diverse and individualized expressions where the preferences of users can potentially differ for the same input. Using PEFT-U, we explore the challenge of efficiently personalizing LLMs to accommodate user-specific preferences in the context of diverse user-centered tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2024.
Builds on
19 of 34 references.
References · 19
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
- 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
7 more
- 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
- 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 140
- 2023Teach LLMs to Personalize -- An Approach inspired by Writing Educationcited by 48
- 2021Did they answer? Subjective acts and intents in conversational discoursecited by 22
- 2020Six Attributes of Unhealthy Conversationcited by 19
- 2021The Origin and Value of Disagreement Among Data Labelers: A Case Study of the Individual Difference in Hate Speech Annotationcited by 15
- 2019Humor in Word Embeddings: Cockamamie Gobbledegook for Nincompoopscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 4.
11 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Personalized Large Language Models: Progress and Future Directionscited by 65
- 2025Teaching Language Models to Evolve with Users: Dynamic Profile Modeling for Personalized Alignmentcited by 22
- 2025Personalize Your LLM: Fake it then Align itcited by 15
- 2026Toward Personalized LLM-Powered Agents: Foundations, Evaluation, and Future Directionscited by 10
- 2026Long Context, Less Focus: A Scaling Gap in LLMs Revealed through Privacy and Personalizationcited by 5
- 2025Evolution of meta's llama models and parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models: a surveycited by 4
- 2025AirLLM: Diffusion Policy-based Adaptive LoRA for Remote Fine-Tuning of LLM over the Aircited by 1
- 2025Hypernetworks for Perspectivist Adaptationcited by 0
- 2025Reflective Personalization Optimization: A Post-hoc Rewriting Framework for Black-Box Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Energy- and Memory-Efficient PEFT Methods for Personalized On-Device SLMs on Consumer GPUscited by 0
- 2026Learning Preference Adaptation for Large Language Model Personalization via Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Learning Preference Adaptation for Large Language Model Personalization via Verbal Reinforcement Learning10 Aug 2026
- 2026Energy- and Memory-Efficient PEFT Methods for Personalized On-Device SLMs on Consumer GPUs5 Aug 2026
- 2026Toward Personalized LLM-Powered Agents: Foundations, Evaluation, and Future Directions26 Feb 2026
- 2026Long Context, Less Focus: A Scaling Gap in LLMs Revealed through Privacy and Personalization16 Feb 2026
- 2025Reflective Personalization Optimization: A Post-hoc Rewriting Framework for Black-Box Large Language Models7 Nov 2025
- 2025Hypernetworks for Perspectivist Adaptation15 Oct 2025
- 2025Evolution of meta's llama models and parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models: a survey14 Oct 2025
- 2025AirLLM: Diffusion Policy-based Adaptive LoRA for Remote Fine-Tuning of LLM over the Air15 Jul 2025
- 2025Teaching Language Models to Evolve with Users: Dynamic Profile Modeling for Personalized Alignment21 May 2025
- 2025Personalize Your LLM: Fake it then Align it2 Mar 2025
- 2025A Survey of Personalized Large Language Models: Progress and Future Directions17 Feb 2025