mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Coarse-to-Fine Proposal Refinement Framework for Audio Temporal Forgery Detection and Localization

arXiv 2407.16554 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2024cs.MM cs.CV cs.SDcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, a novel form of audio partial forgery has posed challenges to its forensics, requiring advanced countermeasures to detect subtle forgery manipulations within long-duration audio. However, existing countermeasures still serve a classification purpose and fail to perform meaningful analysis of the start and end timestamps of partial forgery segments. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel coarse-to-fine proposal refinement framework (CFPRF) that incorporates a frame-level detection network (FDN) and a proposal refinement network (PRN) for audio temporal forgery detection and localization. Specifically, the FDN aims to mine informative inconsistency cues between real and fake frames to obtain discriminative features that are beneficial for roughly indicating forgery regions. The PRN is responsible for predicting confidence scores and regression offsets to refine the coarse-grained proposals derived from the FDN. To learn robust discriminative features, we devise a difference-aware feature learning (DAFL) module guided by contrastive representation learning to enlarge the sensitive differences between different frames induced by minor manipulations. We further design a boundary-aware feature enhancement (BAFE) module to capture the contextual information of multiple transition boundaries and guide the interaction between boundary information and temporal features via a cross-attention mechanism. Extensive experiments show that our CFPRF achieves state-of-the-art performance on various datasets, including LAV-DF, ASVS2019PS, and HAD.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.

Builds on

22 of 41 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  4. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  5. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
  6. 2020FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speechcited by 710
  7. 2021Conditional Variational Autoencoder with Adversarial Learning for End-to-End Text-to-Speechcited by 555
  8. 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
  9. 2021Pay Attention to MLPscited by 367
  10. 2019BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 327
  11. 2020Glow-TTS: A Generative Flow for Text-to-Speech via Monotonic Alignment Searchcited by 269
  12. 2019High Fidelity Speech Synthesis with Adversarial Networkscited by 90
10 more
  1. 2021Guided-TTS: A Diffusion Model for Text-to-Speech via Classifier Guidancecited by 84
  2. 2020BSN++: Complementary Boundary Regressor with Scale-Balanced Relation Modeling for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 65
  3. 2021A Comparative Study on Recent Neural Spoofing Countermeasures for Synthetic Speech Detectioncited by 56
  4. 2021Half-Truth: A Partially Fake Audio Detection Datasetcited by 44
  5. 2023Glitch in the Matrix: A Large Scale Benchmark for Content Driven Audio-Visual Forgery Detection and Localizationcited by 42
  6. 2023UMMAFormer: A Universal Multimodal-adaptive Transformer Framework for Temporal Forgery Localizationcited by 33
  7. 2021An Initial Investigation for Detecting Partially Spoofed Audiocited by 27
  8. 2022Waveform Boundary Detection for Partially Spoofed Audiocited by 15
  9. 2022Fully Automated End-to-End Fake Audio Detectioncited by 10
  10. 2023The defender's perspective on automatic speaker verification: An overviewcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

9 papers.