mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A3Rank: Augmentation Alignment Analysis for Prioritizing Overconfident Failing Samples for Deep Learning Models

arXiv 2407.14114 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sharpening deep learning models by training them with examples close to the decision boundary is a well-known best practice. Nonetheless, these models are still error-prone in producing predictions. In practice, the inference of the deep learning models in many application systems is guarded by a rejector, such as a confidence-based rejector, to filter out samples with insufficient prediction confidence. Such confidence-based rejectors cannot effectively guard against failing samples with high confidence. Existing test case prioritization techniques effectively distinguish confusing samples from confident samples to identify failing samples among the confusing ones, yet prioritizing the failing ones high among many confident ones is challenging. In this paper, we propose A3Rank, a novel test case prioritization technique with augmentation alignment analysis, to address this problem. A3Rank generates augmented versions of each test case and assesses the extent of the prediction result for the test case misaligned with these of the augmented versions and vice versa. Our experiment shows that A3Rank can effectively rank failing samples escaping from the checking of confidence-based rejectors, which significantly outperforms the peer techniques by 163.63% in the detection ratio of top-ranked samples. We also provide a framework to construct a detector devoted to augmenting these rejectors to defend these failing samples, and our detector can achieve a significantly higher defense success rate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2024.

Builds on

27 of 53 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  5. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  6. 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
  7. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  8. 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 333
  9. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  10. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
  11. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  12. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
15 more
  1. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  2. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 183
  3. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  4. 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
  5. 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
  6. 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 107
  7. 2019Deep Neural Rejection against Adversarial Examplescited by 31
  8. 2019Test Selection for Deep Learning Systemscited by 27
  9. 2020Know Your Limits: Uncertainty Estimation with ReLU Classifiers Fails at Reliable OOD Detectioncited by 26
  10. 2018Uncertainty-Aware Attention for Reliable Interpretation and Predictioncited by 24
  11. 2021Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative Modelscited by 22
  12. 2018Failure Prediction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 14
  13. 2021Exposing Previously Undetectable Faults in Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
  14. 2021Revisiting Neuron Coverage for DNN Testing: A Layer-Wise and Distribution-Aware Criterioncited by 9
  15. 2022Aries: Efficient Testing of Deep Neural Networks via Labeling-Free Accuracy Estimationcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.