Quantum Hamiltonian Embedding of Images for Data Reuploading Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When applying quantum computing to machine learning tasks, one of the first considerations is the design of the quantum machine learning model itself. Conventionally, the design of quantum machine learning algorithms relies on the ``quantisation" of classical learning algorithms, such as using quantum linear algebra to implement important subroutines of classical algorithms, if not the entire algorithm, seeking to achieve quantum advantage through possible run-time accelerations brought by quantum computing. However, recent research has started questioning whether quantum advantage via speedup is the right goal for quantum machine learning [1]. Research also has been undertaken to exploit properties that are unique to quantum systems, such as quantum contextuality, to better design quantum machine learning models [2]. In this paper, we take an alternative approach by incorporating the heuristics and empirical evidences from the design of classical deep learning algorithms to the design of quantum neural networks. We first construct a model based on the data reuploading circuit [3] with the quantum Hamiltonian data embedding unitary [4]. Through numerical experiments on images datasets, including the famous MNIST and FashionMNIST datasets, we demonstrate that our model outperforms the quantum convolutional neural network (QCNN)[5] by a large margin (up to over 40% on MNIST test set). Based on the model design process and numerical results, we then laid out six principles for designing quantum machine learning models, especially quantum neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2024.
Builds on
33 of 77 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,054
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
21 more
- 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 688
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 496
- 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 325
- 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
- 2023What Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length Generalizationcited by 198
- 2024LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworkscited by 178
- 2024Transformers need glasses! Information over-squashing in language taskscited by 87
- 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 82
- 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalizationcited by 78
- 2024Alice in Wonderland: Simple Tasks Showing Complete Reasoning Breakdown in State-Of-the-Art Large Language Modelscited by 67
- 2024Deep Networks Always Grok and Here is Whycited by 49
- 2024Do language models plan ahead for future tokens?cited by 47
- 2024Neural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random Functionscited by 43
- 2024How Far Can Transformers Reason? The Globality Barrier and Inductive Scratchpadcited by 35
- 2017Quantum Neuron: an elementary building block for machine learning on quantum computerscited by 34
- 2024An Image is Worth More Than 16x16 Patches: Exploring Transformers on Individual Pixelscited by 32
- 2021Quantum Self-Supervised Learningcited by 20
- 2024On the Brittle Foundations of ReAct Prompting for Agentic Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2024VQC-Based Reinforcement Learning with Data Re-uploading: Performance and Trainabilitycited by 12
- 2024Classification of the Fashion-MNIST Dataset on a Quantum Computercited by 9
- 2024Consciousness qua Mortal Computationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Evaluating Angle and Amplitude Encoding Strategies for Variational Quantum Machine Learning: their impact on model's accuracycited by 1
- 2025Quantum feature-map learning with reduced resource overheadcited by 1
- 2026Quantum Circuit-Based Learning Models: Bridging Quantum Computing and Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2024Let the Quantum Creep In: Designing Quantum Neural Network Models by Gradually Swapping Out Classical Componentscited by 0
- 2026Quantum Circuit-Based Learning Models: Bridging Quantum Computing and Machine Learning19 Jan 2026
- 2025Quantum feature-map learning with reduced resource overhead3 Oct 2025
- 2025Evaluating Angle and Amplitude Encoding Strategies for Variational Quantum Machine Learning: their impact on model's accuracy1 Aug 2025
- 2024Let the Quantum Creep In: Designing Quantum Neural Network Models by Gradually Swapping Out Classical Components26 Sep 2024