mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Let the Quantum Creep In: Designing Quantum Neural Network Models by Gradually Swapping Out Classical Components

arXiv 2409.17583 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2024quant-ph cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence (AI), with its multiplier effect and wide applications in multiple areas, could potentially be an important application of quantum computing. Since modern AI systems are often built on neural networks, the design of quantum neural networks becomes a key challenge in integrating quantum computing into AI. To provide a more fine-grained characterisation of the impact of quantum components on the performance of neural networks, we propose a framework where classical neural network layers are gradually replaced by quantum layers that have the same type of input and output while keeping the flow of information between layers unchanged, different from most current research in quantum neural network, which favours an end-to-end quantum model. We start with a simple three-layer classical neural network without any normalisation layers or activation functions, and gradually change the classical layers to the corresponding quantum versions. We conduct numerical experiments on image classification datasets such as the MNIST, FashionMNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets to demonstrate the change of performance brought by the systematic introduction of quantum components. Through this framework, our research sheds new light on the design of future quantum neural network models where it could be more favourable to search for methods and frameworks that harness the advantages from both the classical and quantum worlds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  6. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  7. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 325
  8. 2021Equinox: neural networks in JAX via callable PyTrees and filtered transformationscited by 143
  9. 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 82
  10. 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 78
  11. 2024Neural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random Functionscited by 43
  12. 2024Compositional Generative Modeling: A Single Model is Not All You Needcited by 41
5 more
  1. 2023Shadows of quantum machine learningcited by 31
  2. 2022Designing Ecosystems of Intelligence from First Principlescited by 23
  3. 2024Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAIcited by 10
  4. 2024Arbitrary Polynomial Separations in Trainable Quantum Machine Learningcited by 5
  5. 2024Quantum Hamiltonian Embedding of Images for Data Reuploading Classifierscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.