CoAPT: Context Attribute words for Prompt Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a novel prompt tuning method called CoAPT(Context Attribute words in Prompt Tuning) for few/zero-shot image classification. The core motivation is that attributes are descriptive words with rich information about a given concept. Thus, we aim to enrich text queries of existing prompt tuning methods, improving alignment between text and image embeddings in CLIP embedding space. To do so, CoAPT integrates attribute words as additional prompts within learnable prompt tuning and can be easily incorporated into various existing prompt tuning methods. To facilitate the incorporation of attributes into text embeddings and the alignment with image embeddings, soft prompts are trained together with an additional meta-network that generates input-image-wise feature biases from the concatenated feature encodings of the image-text combined queries. Our experiments demonstrate that CoAPT leads to considerable improvements for existing baseline methods on several few/zero-shot image classification tasks, including base-to-novel generalization, cross-dataset transfer, and domain generalization. Our findings highlight the importance of combining hard and soft prompts and pave the way for future research on the interplay between text and image latent spaces in pre-trained models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.
Builds on
50 of 62 references.
References · 50
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
38 more
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
- 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
- 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
- 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
- 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 376
- 2021Prompting Visual-Language Models for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 309
- 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimizationcited by 307
- 2021Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recallcited by 291
- 2023Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 272
- 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 263
- 2020AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Promptscited by 246
- 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 220
- 2023Preventing Zero-Shot Transfer Degradation in Continual Learning of Vision-Language Modelscited by 112
- 2021BERTese: Learning to Speak to BERTcited by 82
- 2023DePT: Decoupled Prompt Tuningcited by 58
- 2023Multi-Modal Classifiers for Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 53
- 2022Multitask Vision-Language Prompt Tuningcited by 51
- 2023Enhancing CLIP with GPT-4: Harnessing Visual Descriptions as Promptscited by 48
- 2023ArGue: Attribute-Guided Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 39
- 2024Prompt Learning via Meta-Regularizationcited by 26
- 2024Democratizing Fine-grained Visual Recognition with Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2023EXIF as Language: Learning Cross-Modal Associations Between Images and Camera Metadatacited by 17
- 2023PerceptionCLIP: Visual Classification by Inferring and Conditioning on Contextscited by 16
- 2023Prompting Scientific Names for Zero-Shot Species Recognitioncited by 14
- 2023Follow-Up Differential Descriptions: Language Models Resolve Ambiguities for Image Classificationcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.