mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prompting Scientific Names for Zero-Shot Species Recognition

arXiv 2310.09929 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trained on web-scale image-text pairs, Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP can recognize images of common objects in a zero-shot fashion. However, it is underexplored how to use CLIP for zero-shot recognition of highly specialized concepts, e.g., species of birds, plants, and animals, for which their scientific names are written in Latin or Greek. Indeed, CLIP performs poorly for zero-shot species recognition with prompts that use scientific names, e.g., "a photo of Lepus Timidus" (which is a scientific name in Latin). Because these names are usually not included in CLIP's training set. To improve performance, prior works propose to use large-language models (LLMs) to generate descriptions (e.g., of species color and shape) and additionally use them in prompts. We find that they bring only marginal gains. Differently, we are motivated to translate scientific names (e.g., Lepus Timidus) to common English names (e.g., mountain hare) and use such in the prompts. We find that common names are more likely to be included in CLIP's training set, and prompting them achieves 2~5 times higher accuracy on benchmarking datasets of fine-grained species recognition.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2023.

Builds on

13 of 19 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  4. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  5. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  6. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 538
  7. 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 336
  8. 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 267
  9. 2016Learning Visual N-Grams from Web Datacited by 95
  10. 2017Link the head to the "beak": Zero Shot Learning from Noisy Text Description at Part Precisioncited by 46
  11. 2021A Realistic Evaluation of Semi-Supervised Learning for Fine-Grained Classificationcited by 36
  12. 2021The Semi-Supervised iNaturalist-Aves Challenge at FGVC7 Workshopcited by 21
1 more
  1. 2021The Semi-Supervised iNaturalist Challenge at the FGVC8 Workshopcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Improved Zero-Shot Classification by Adapting VLMs with Text Descriptions
  2. 2025Evaluation of the Automated Labeling Method for Taxonomic Nomenclature Through Prompt-Optimized Large Language Model
  3. 2025Neural Catalog: Scaling Species Recognition with Catalog of Life-Augmented Generation
  4. 2026Can Edge-Deployable Vision-Language Models Identify Species?
  5. 2025Are vision-language models ready to zero-shot replace supervised classification models in agriculture?
  6. 2023Multimodal Foundation Models for Zero-shot Animal Species Recognition in Camera Trap Images
  7. 2024VLM4Bio: A Benchmark Dataset to Evaluate Pretrained Vision-Language Models for Trait Discovery from Biological Images
  8. 2024Distilling Named Entity Recognition Models for Endangered Species from Large Language Models