mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Follow-Up Differential Descriptions: Language Models Resolve Ambiguities for Image Classification

arXiv 2311.07593 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.CV cs.LGcited by 13

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

A promising approach for improving the performance of vision-language models like CLIP for image classification is to extend the class descriptions (i.e., prompts) with related attributes, e.g., using brown sparrow instead of sparrow. However, current zero-shot methods select a subset of attributes regardless of commonalities between the target classes, potentially providing no useful information that would have helped to distinguish between them. For instance, they may use color instead of bill shape to distinguish between sparrows and wrens, which are both brown. We propose Follow-up Differential Descriptions (FuDD), a zero-shot approach that tailors the class descriptions to each dataset and leads to additional attributes that better differentiate the target classes. FuDD first identifies the ambiguous classes for each image, and then uses a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate new class descriptions that differentiate between them. The new class descriptions resolve the initial ambiguity and help predict the correct label. In our experiments, FuDD consistently outperforms generic description ensembles and naive LLM-generated descriptions on 12 datasets. We show that differential descriptions are an effective tool to resolve class ambiguities, which otherwise significantly degrade the performance. We also show that high quality natural language class descriptions produced by FuDD result in comparable performance to few-shot adaptation methods.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 44 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.

Builds on

44 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Concepts12 Jun
  2. 2023Enhancing CLIP with CLIP: Exploring Pseudolabeling for Limited-Label Prompt Tuning2 Jun
  3. 2022SuS-X: Training-Free Name-Only Transfer of Vision-Language Models28 Nov
  4. 2022Unified Vision and Language Prompt Learning13 Oct
  5. 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Models13 Oct
  6. 2022Unsupervised Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models7 Apr
  7. 2022Learning to Compose Soft Prompts for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning7 Apr
  8. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  9. 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modeling6 Nov
  10. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct
  11. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  8. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  9. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  10. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  11. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  12. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
21 more
  1. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  2. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  3. 2021StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN Imagerycited by 990
  4. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  5. 2023Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 740
  6. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
  7. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 591
  8. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  9. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
  10. 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 530
  11. 2022Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Languagecited by 513
  12. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 507
  13. 2021PointCLIP: Point Cloud Understanding by CLIPcited by 461
  14. 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 310
  15. 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 263
  16. 2013Zero-Shot Learning Through Cross-Modal Transfercited by 237
  17. 2023Prompt, Generate, then Cache: Cascade of Foundation Models makes Strong Few-shot Learnerscited by 152
  18. 2022CALIP: Zero-Shot Enhancement of CLIP with Parameter-free Attentioncited by 103
  19. 2023CHiLS: Zero-Shot Image Classification with Hierarchical Label Setscited by 79
  20. 2023See, Think, Confirm: Interactive Prompting Between Vision and Language Models for Knowledge-based Visual Reasoningcited by 49
  21. 2023LaFTer: Label-Free Tuning of Zero-shot Classifier using Language and Unlabeled Image Collectionscited by 43

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 7.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Enhancing Visual Classification using Comparative Descriptors
  2. 2026Attributes Should Come from Images, Not Class Names: Distribution-Conditioned Attribute Selection for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024Improved Zero-Shot Classification by Adapting VLMs with Text Descriptions
  4. 2024Evolving Interpretable Visual Classifiers with Large Language Models
  5. 2024Real Classification by Description: Extending CLIP's Limits of Part Attributes Recognition
  6. 2024Embracing Diversity: Interpretable Zero-shot classification beyond one vector per class
  7. 2024LLM meets Vision-Language Models for Zero-Shot One-Class Classification
  8. 2023ChatGPT-Powered Hierarchical Comparisons for Image Classification