mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness-Aware Multi-Group Target Detection in Online Discussion

arXiv 2407.11933 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Target-group detection is the task of detecting which group(s) a piece of content is ``directed at or about''. Applications include targeted marketing, content recommendation, and group-specific content assessment. Key challenges include: 1) that a single post may target multiple groups; and 2) ensuring consistent detection accuracy across groups for fairness. In this work, we investigate fairness implications of target-group detection in the context of toxicity detection, where the perceived harm of a social media post often depends on which group(s) it targets. Because toxicity is highly contextual, language that appears benign in general can be harmful when targeting specific demographic groups. We show our em fairness-aware multi-group target detection approach both reduces bias across groups and shows strong predictive performance, surpassing existing fairness-aware baselines. To enable reproducibility and spur future work, we share our code online.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2024.

Builds on

23 of 48 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  5. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  6. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  7. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  8. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  9. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  10. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  11. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
  12. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 139
11 more
  1. 2022Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Modelscited by 115
  2. 2023When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective Taskscited by 89
  3. 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
  4. 2021Designing Toxic Content Classification for a Diversity of Perspectivescited by 63
  5. 2020Demoting Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detectioncited by 62
  6. 2022Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Trainingcited by 22
  7. 2020Multi-label classification: do Hamming loss and subset accuracy really conflict with each other?cited by 14
  8. 2022Justice in Misinformation Detection Systems: An Analysis of Algorithms, Stakeholders, and Potential Harmscited by 10
  9. 2023Same Same, But Different: Conditional Multi-Task Learning for Demographic-Specific Toxicity Detectioncited by 10
  10. 2024Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairnesscited by 7
  11. 2022Finding Pareto Trade-offs in Fair and Accurate Detection of Toxic Speechcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.