mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancing

arXiv 2407.11624 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Driven by the powerful representation ability of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), plentiful GNN models have been widely deployed in many real-world applications. Nevertheless, due to distribution disparities between different demographic groups, fairness in high-stake decision-making systems is receiving increasing attention. Although lots of recent works devoted to improving the fairness of GNNs and achieved considerable success, they all require significant architectural changes or additional loss functions requiring more hyper-parameter tuning. Surprisingly, we find that simple re-balancing methods can easily match or surpass existing fair GNN methods. We claim that the imbalance across different demographic groups is a significant source of unfairness, resulting in imbalanced contributions from each group to the parameters updating. However, these simple re-balancing methods have their own shortcomings during training. In this paper, we propose FairGB, Fair Graph Neural Network via re-Balancing, which mitigates the unfairness of GNNs by group balancing. Technically, FairGB consists of two modules: counterfactual node mixup and contribution alignment loss. Firstly, we select counterfactual pairs across inter-domain and inter-class, and interpolate the ego-networks to generate new samples. Guided by analysis, we can reveal the debiasing mechanism of our model by the causal view and prove that our strategy can make sensitive attributes statistically independent from target labels. Secondly, we reweigh the contribution of each group according to gradients. By combining these two modules, they can mutually promote each other. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method can achieve state-of-the-art results concerning both utility and fairness metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhixunLEE/FairGB.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2024.

Builds on

35 of 62 references.

References · 35

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  6. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  7. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 181
  8. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
  9. 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
  10. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  11. 2021GraphSMOTE: Imbalanced Node Classification on Graphs with Graph Neural Networkscited by 147
  12. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
23 more
  1. 2021Causal Attention for Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Classificationcited by 108
  2. 2021EDITS: Modeling and Mitigating Data Bias for Graph Neural Networkscited by 92
  3. 2024ZeroG: Investigating Cross-dataset Zero-shot Transferability in Graphscited by 85
  4. 2018GAMENet: Graph Augmented MEmory Networks for Recommending Medication Combinationcited by 83
  5. 2022Debiasing Graph Neural Networks via Learning Disentangled Causal Substructurecited by 83
  6. 2022Fairness in Graph Mining: A Surveycited by 76
  7. 2022Learning Fair Node Representations with Graph Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 58
  8. 2021Topology-Imbalance Learning for Semi-Supervised Node Classificationcited by 56
  9. 2020Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from Datacited by 54
  10. 2023GSLB: The Graph Structure Learning Benchmarkcited by 50
  11. 2019Average Individual Fairness: Algorithms, Generalization and Experimentscited by 46
  12. 2022TAM: Topology-Aware Margin Loss for Class-Imbalanced Node Classificationcited by 41
  13. 2022FMP: Toward Fair Graph Message Passing against Topology Biascited by 35
  14. 2021CrossWalk: Fairness-enhanced Node Representation Learningcited by 34
  15. 2022Bias Mimicking: A Simple Sampling Approach for Bias Mitigationcited by 30
  16. 2023Towards Fair Graph Neural Networks via Graph Counterfactualcited by 23
  17. 2023Uncovering Neural Scaling Laws in Molecular Representation Learningcited by 23
  18. 2023GraphSHA: Synthesizing Harder Samples for Class-Imbalanced Node Classificationcited by 17
  19. 2024Graph Sparsification via Mixture of Graphscited by 17
  20. 2022The Devil is in the Conflict: Disentangled Information Graph Neural Networks for Fraud Detectioncited by 11
  21. 2023Selective Mixup Helps with Distribution Shifts, But Not (Only) because of Mixupcited by 8
  22. 2024The Heterophilic Snowflake Hypothesis: Training and Empowering GNNs for Heterophilic Graphscited by 6
  23. 2023Disparity, Inequality, and Accuracy Tradeoffs in Graph Neural Networks for Node Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

11 papers.